My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
011607
>
REGULAR MEETING
>
04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2007 12:01:47 PM
Creation date
1/11/2007 1:27:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/16/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
04
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />connection between hours and cost of service that some feel is lacking in the traditional UBC table method. <br />We are currently conducting this analysis for the cities of Roseville and Whittier. The city may want to <br />explore moving to an actual cost basis for inspection services. Because this process is more detailed and time <br />consuming. we offer it on optional basis. If the City desires this approach, PRM will be pleased to develop a <br />process for it. <br /> <br />c) Financial AnalYsis: Once the basic time and workload transaction data is gathered from the <br />departmental intervieWS, salary data, departmental service and supply cost data is entered into the PRM user <br />fee software. This departmental data is integrated with the indirect cost data developed within the PRM cost <br />allocation plan module. The direct costs and indirect cost of each fee is calculated and displayed for review. <br /> <br />d) User Fee Manalement RllP"rts: All the financial, transaction and comparison data is reported in <br />the final management reports. Each department is provided an opportunity to review the cost/revenue data at <br />least two separate times. This ensures that the raw data is as accurate as possible, resulting in a more reliable <br />final report. <br /> <br />SUMMARY: <br /> <br />Once the data analysis is completed PRM assists the city with presentations to management, elected ofllcials <br />and to the public as needed. PRM looks forward to assisting the city in the full study analysis if that option is <br />selected. <br /> <br />C. Tentative Schedule: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The city's RFP requested a project schedule of I S weeks. Below is our proposed work plan and schedule: <br /> <br />Month: Weeks One and Two: <br /> <br />I) Meet with City management team and department heads to review study goals and <br />objectives. Provide kick off meeting per the suggested communication plan. <br />2) Obtain budgets. salary levels. staff lists. & expenditure data. <br />3) Begin meetings with departments <br />4) Begin structuring project data into PRM systems <br /> <br />Month: Weeks Three and Eip.t: <br /> <br />I) Obtain any feedback from departments. continue communication, and answer <br />questions. <br />2) Begin to enter financial and transaction data into the PRM models <br />3) Complete draft cost allocation plan. <br /> <br />Public Resource Management Group, llC <br /> <br />PRM <br /> <br />City of Pleasanlon Proposal 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.