My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 92217
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
RES 92217
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2012 12:33:00 PM
Creation date
8/11/1999 7:02:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/17/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 92-217 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION UPHOLDING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />THEREBY APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE MAP TRACT 6563 FOR 38 <br />LOTS, THE APPLICATION OF CURRIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />Currin Construction Company has applied for a vesting <br />tentative map to allow the subdivision of an <br />approximately 91-acre site into 55 single-family lots and <br />one, approximately 41-acre open space lot, located at <br />8015 Foothill Road; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development) <br />- Rural Density Residential/Low Density Residential <br />District; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the <br />vesting tentative tract'map on November 11, 1992, and <br />approved a 38-1ot subdivision for this site; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />the applicant appealed to the City Council for approval <br />of the 55-1ot subdivision application; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />a public hearing was held on November 17, 1992, at which <br />time the City Council considered all public testimony, <br />relevant exhibits and recommendations of the City staff <br />concerning this application; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />the City Council could not make the tentative map <br />findings that the proposed 55-1ot subdivision was <br />consistent with the City's General Plan because the <br />acceptable risk policy stated in the Public Safety <br />Element of the General Plan could not be met with 17 of <br />the 55 homes proposed to be located on the hillside or <br />closer than 50 feet to the toe of the hillslope; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />the City Council could not make the tentative map finding <br />that the site is physically suitable for the 55-1ot <br />subdivision because the hillside and areas within 50-100 <br />feet of the toe of the slope are susceptible to risk of <br />movement and instability due to seismic or landslide- <br />induced hazards, and therefore pose a potential risk of <br />damage to structures, utility lines and roads; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />the City Council determined that the stability of the <br />ancient landslide does not meet the City's acceptable <br />risk policy of the General Plan Public Safety Element to <br />allow houses to be constructed on, or within, 50-100 feet <br />of the toe of the slope, but that a 38-1ot subdivision, <br />with homes located entirely on the flatter portion of the <br />site, was appropriate for the site; and <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.