RES 91200 - Laserfiche WebLink

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. 91-200 RESOLUTION APPROVING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE APPLICATION OF PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND ROBERTSON HOMES FOR A GE1dERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONING AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL AS FILED UNDER CASES GP-91-4/P[7D-81-30-24M/PUD-81-30-53D WHEREAS, at its meeting of December 10, 1991, the City Council received a proposed mitigated negative declaration for the application of Prudential Insurance Company and Robertson Homes for a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation of a 79.39 acre site from Business Park (Industrial/Office/Commercial) to High Density Residential); an application to change the PUD zoning of the 79.39 acre property from PUD-Industrial/Commercial/Office to Planned Unit Development - High Density Residential (PUD-HDR); and an application for approval of a development plan for 878 apartment units (including 25 percent low-income units) for 27.08 acres of the site; and WHEREAS, the site is located at 5675 Stoneridge Drive, bordered by Tassajara Creek on the east, Stoneridge and Owens Drives on the south and north and Hacienda Drive on the west; and WHEREAS, the City Council received and reviewed the Initial Study dated June 21, 1991 and received the recommendations of the staff and Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held at which time the public was given the opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed General Plan Amendment, rezoning and development plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the potential impacts in accordance with the applicable state and local guidelines governing the preparation of Negative Declarations and Environmental Impact Reports; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposed General Plan Amendment, rezoning and development plan would not have any significant adverse effects on the environment; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposed project will have no potential for adverse impacts on the site's wildlife;