Laserfiche WebLink
5.b.2. Find The "No Project" alternative is <br />infeasible. <br />Fact: See 3.a.1. <br />S.C. Significant Effect: Erosion potential is high due to <br />grading and construction operations. <br />5.c.1. Finding: The revised plan substantially <br />lessens this effect. <br />Fact: Extensive erosion control is included in <br />the development plan, including <br />hydroseeding and silt fences around man- <br />graded areas. <br />Fact: All major grading will occur at once, <br />with developer-installed erosion control <br />measures following, to minimize improper <br />erosion control and/or failure to <br />maintain erosion control devices over <br />time. <br />Fact: The revised plan eliminates the area of <br />major grading on the upper south knoll. <br />Fact: Storm water runoff would be controlled <br />through surface drainage measures to <br />reduce sheet flow over graded cut/fill <br />areas and to discharge flows to natural <br />drainage courses in appropriately <br />designed, energy dissipating means. <br />5.c.2. Finding: The "No Project" alternative is <br />infeasible. <br />Fact: See 3.a.1. <br />6. Public Facilities and Services <br />6.A. Significant Effect: The project is a potential fire <br />risk due to its location and design. <br />6.a.1. Finding: The revised project substantially <br />lessens this effect. <br />Fact: The longest, steep road has been <br />deleted. <br />Fact: Street grades are predominantly 15$ or <br />less. <br />-9- <br />