My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 89-004
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
PC 89-004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2013 2:40:44 PM
Creation date
12/18/2006 8:43:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/11/1989
DOCUMENT NO
PC 89-04
DOCUMENT NAME
SP-88-3
NOTES
City's General Plan
NOTES 3
south of I-580, west of El Charro Rd, north of Trenery Dr, and east of the Gatewood Apts
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br />RESOLUTION N0. PC-89-4 <br />SOLUTION RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF THE STONETHDOF DRIVE <br />RE <br />SPECIFIC PLAN FOR A 293 ACRE SINORTHCOFETRENERY DRIVE, <br />I-580, WEST OF EGATEHWO D APARTMENTS <br />AND EAST OF THE <br />the City's General Plan calls for the preparation of a <br />WHEREAS, g osed <br />Specific Plan for the 293 acre area alon the prop <br />Stoneridge Drive Extension; and <br />o ert owners see a market demand for development in <br />WHEREAS, pr P Y <br />the near future; and <br />ublic hearing was held on January 11, 1980 osed ich <br />WHEREAS, a P <br />time the Planning Commissionaneand consideredpall <br />Stoneridge Drive Specific P1 <br />orts documents, testimony, and recommendations; and <br />rep , <br />re aced for SP-88-3 <br />WHEREAS, an Environmental Impac9 aeresolution accepting the <br />and on January 11, 198 ort as complete and adequate was <br />Environmental Impact Rep <br />adopted; and <br />the EIR indicates significant environmarizedeinethe <br />WHEREAS, ro ect, as summ <br />would result from the P ~ Exhibit "A" attached <br />Environmental Impa~~ ofnthisscase by reference; and <br />hereto and made p <br />uidelines adopted pursuant <br />WHEREAS, CEQA and state and local EIR g <br />re ire the Planning Commission to make nificant <br />thereto qu <br />findings where an EIR identifies rovalr f thesproject; <br />effects which may result from app <br />and <br />REAS this Planning Commission finds that potentially <br />WHE ~ si nificant environmental effects either (1) have been <br />g ro'ect conditions of approval or <br />mitigated by p 7 ro'ect during the review <br />modifications made to the p 7 another public agency <br />process, (2) require mitigation by <br />or (3) cannot be mitigated except <br />having jurisdiction, <br />b mitigation measures or alternativesronmental,band <br />Y envi <br />infeasible given economThesfacts~and findings supporting <br />other considerations. <br />these findings are summarized in the En beoreviewed at <br />' Exhibit "A which ca <br />Impact Findings, 200 Old Bernal Avenue, <br />the Planning Department, <br />asanton, California and as are more fully found in <br />Ple ro ect, and <br />the administrative record of this P 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.