PC 90-099 - Laserfiche WebLink

Because of the non-conforming lot dimensions, the property does not have the same amount of usable side yard area in which to place the covered carport as other lots which meet the minimum development standards for the applicable zoning district. 3) That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Locating the carport 4 feet from the easterly side yard property line would not be detrimental to the privacy of the surrounding area. With regards to compliance with Fire and Building Codes, the Building Department has conducted a code compliance site investigation. The investigation revealed that permit records for the carport and garage conversion are not available from when the structures were built 30 plus years ago. However, based on the results of the code compliance investigation, the structures are built in compliance with the applicable Building Code requirements. 4) That neither present traffic volumes genet site or the uses of reasonably require interpretation and specified regulation. nor anticipated future sated by the use of the sites in the vicinity strict or literal enforcement of the The future residential use of the property will not generate the level of traffic which requires strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the Pleasanton Parking Ordinance due to the limitations placed on occupancy and the limited size of the residential units. 5) That the granting of the variance will not result in the parking or loading of vehicles on public streets in such a manner as to interfere with the free flow of traffic on the streets. The variance request deals with the location of required parking spaces not the required number of spaces which must be provided. There Resolution No. PC-90-99 October 24, 1990