Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br />RESOLUTION N0. PC-90-77 <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING TRACT 6311, THE DIVISION STREET PARTNERS <br />WHEREAS, Division Street Partners has applied for approval to <br />subdivide an approximately 2.4 acre site into nine <br />single-family residential lots, averaging approximately <br />4,187 square feet in size, and a remainder parcel to be <br />dedicated for flood control purposes located at 1045 <br />Division Street; and <br />WHEREAS, zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development) <br />- MDR (Medium Density Residential) District; and <br />WHEREAS, at their duly noticed public hearing of July 25, 1990, <br />the Planning Commission considered all public testimony, <br />relevant exhibits and recommendations of the City staff <br />concerning this application; and <br />WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was approved for the development <br />plan approval affecting this project. Subdivision of <br />this site was included within the scope of that prior <br />environmental assessment. Therefore, this application is <br />not considered to be a new project under the California <br />Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no new <br />environmental document is required; and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made the following tentative map <br />findings: <br />1. The proposed map is consistent with the general <br />plan. <br />The Land Use Element of the General Plan designates <br />the project site as Medium Density Residential, <br />which allows a density of 2 to 8 dwelling units per <br />gross acre. The project density is 3.6 units per <br />acre which is within the allowed density range. <br />There is an approved development plan for the <br />project which has a Growth Management Program <br />allocation. Therefore, the project conforms to the <br />City's General Plan growth policies in regards to <br />this subdivision. The approved development plan <br />also conforms to the General Plan policy of <br />preserving the Arroyo del Valle. <br />2. The site is physically suitable for this type of <br />development and density. <br />