My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:287
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:287
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/3/2007 4:25:02 PM
Creation date
12/13/2006 3:40:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
12/19/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:287
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />limited alcoholic beverage service after 10:00 p.m. In order to approve the use permit, the City <br />Council must make the findings that are required to grant a use permit approval. These findings <br />are list in Exhibit 1. <br /> <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br /> <br />Ruby Hill development, including the subject site, is not part of the Vineyard Avenue Corridor <br />Specific Plan area. By prior Development Agreement, the proposed development is not subject <br />to the Citywide and area wide traffic mitigation fees. Except for sewage fees, which would be <br />paid to the City of Livermore, the applicant would be required to pay all other required City fees <br />for this development. A condition of approval has addressed this issue. <br /> <br />The proposed modification would otherwise have a negligible financial impact on the City. <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> <br />A Negative Declaration was prepared in conjunction with the proposed development. Based on <br />the Initial Study and Negative Declaration, the project would not have a significant effect on the <br />environment. The proposed project plans have been revised to avoid significant effects or miti- <br />gated by design to a point where the effects are insignificant and there is no substantial evidence <br />that the project as revised may have a significant effect. A copy of the Negative Declaration is <br />attached. <br /> <br />CONCLUSION <br /> <br />Staff believes that the proposed event center and winery facility would establish a compatible <br />use for the area and would meet the goals of the Pleasanton General Plan and the South Liver- <br />more Valley Area Plan. The overall design of the proposed development includes many archi- <br />tectural features that are seen in wineries of the Napa/Sonoma area. The fountain and the en- <br />trance are the focal point, while the gallery and the inner courtyard area create an attractive, pe- <br />destrian-oriented space. The views of the facility from Vineyard Avenue and Isabel Avenue <br />would reinforce the winemaking heritage of the Ruby Hill area. As proposed and conditioned, <br />staff and the Planning Commission found that the project would be compatible with the existing <br />homes of the Ruby Hill development. <br /> <br />Respectfull}jmbmitted, <br /> <br />o;r~~ <br /> <br />'rry Iserson, Director of <br />Planning and Community <br />Development <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />David P. Culver <br />Director of Finance <br /> <br />Nelson Fialho <br />City Manager <br /> <br />SR:06: 287 <br />Page 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.