Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Water Operations and Maintenance (0 & M) and Debt ServiceFunds <br /> <br />The Water Operating Fund highlights include: <br />~ Ending Fund Balance (un-audited and before carryovers) of$IO.8 million. <br />~ $800,000 surplus of revenues and transfers compared to expenditures. <br />~ Water sales were just $43,000 under projections at $15.7 million. <br />~ Expenses (after carryovers of $401,000) were under budget by $532,000, <br />including: <br />./ personnel costs ($280,000) <br />./ electricity ($78,000) <br />./ professional services ($88,000) <br />./ overhead charges by the General Fund ($101,000) <br />~ The cost of water purchased from Zone 7 came in essentially at budget. <br /> <br />Included in the request for carryover ($401,000 noted above) is $314,000 for the City's <br />commercial irrigation and water conservation rebate and water audit program. The program is <br />intended to benefit commercial irrigation customers by educating and rewarding customers who <br />demonstrate consistent conservation habits. Funding for the program came from a small <br />surcharge levied for four years on water consumed by the City's commercial irrigation <br />customers. The City is dedicating two part-time intern positions to remarketing and <br />administering the program in 2007. The current funding was approved by City Council to <br />continue until December 2006. Staff is, therefore, requesting an extension of this program <br />through FY 2007-08. <br /> <br />Sewer Operations and Maintenance (0 & M) and Debt Funds <br /> <br />The Sewer Operating Funds highlights included: <br />~ Ending Fund Balance (un-audited and before carryovers) of $4.45 million. <br />~ Budget draw down of $333,000 from Fund Balance was actually only <br />$203,000 (after carryovers of $32,000) <br />~ cost savings included: <br />./ lower regional sewer charges ($66,000), <br />./ contract services ($36,000) <br />./ electricity ($25,000). <br /> <br />Note that residential sewer charges are based on fixed rates and do not follow the same trends as <br />water consumption (especially summer irrigation water). Therefore, the projected versus actual <br />variances are often larger for water rate revenues than for sewer rate revenues, which include <br />both local revenues and regional revenues [passed on to the Dublin San Ramon Services District <br />(DSRSD) for sewer treatment and to the Livermore-Amador Valley Water Management Agency <br />(LA VWMA) for export]. <br /> <br />SR 06:259 <br /> <br />7 <br />