My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:271
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:271
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2006 12:32:18 PM
Creation date
11/29/2006 12:14:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
12/5/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:271
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Grading and Drainage <br /> <br />The subject lot has been pre-graded per PUD requirements. Minor grading would be necessary <br />for the building pad area, On site drainage would be directed toward the front. The applicant <br />would be required to submit an on-site drainage plan to the Planning Director for review and ap- <br />proval. A condition of approval has included addressing this item. <br /> <br />V. PUBLIC NOTICE <br /> <br />Notices of the Planning Commission's public hearing on this item were sent to the homeowners <br />located within 1,000-feet of the subject property including homes surrounding Callippe Preserve <br />Golf Course, Staff has not received any verbal or written comments pertaining to the proposed <br />project as of the time the staff report was written, <br /> <br />VI. PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN FINDINGS <br /> <br />The Pleasanton Municipal Code sets forth the purposes of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) <br />District and the considerations to be addressed in reviewing a PUD development plan proposal <br />or modifications of an approved development plan. The proposal establishes design guidelines <br />and requests to change review procedures of the future house designs, it would not involve a <br />change in density, lotting, etc., staff believes that the proposed modification would be covered <br />by the previously approved development plan findings. <br /> <br />VII. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> <br />PUD-99-07-03M: Environmental review for the proposed project was undertaken with the Fi- <br />nal Environmental Impact Report (EIR) approved by the City Council for the Happy Valley <br />Specific Plan in conformance with the standards of the California Environmental Quality Act <br />(CEQA). There are no substantial changes to the project or to the circumstances under which <br />the project is being undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or that sub- <br />stantially increase the severity of previously identified effects. Furthermore, there is no new in- <br />formation of substantial importance, which was unknown at the time that the Final EIR was ap- <br />proved by the City Council regarding the project or its effects, mitigation measures, or alterna- <br />tives. Any previously identified effects or impacts are mitigated to a level of insignificance, <br />with the mitigation measures incorporated into the project's design or imposed on the project <br />pursuant to the conditions of approval. Therefore, no new environmental document accompa- <br />nies this staff report. <br /> <br />PDR-579: The proposed residence is categorically exempt from the requirements of Section <br />15303, Class 3 (New Construction) ofthe California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). <br />Therefore, no environmental document accompanies this report, <br /> <br />Case No. PUD-99-07-03MJPDR-579 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />Planning Commission <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.