SR 06:270 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Michael Renquist, property owner of251l Yolanda Court, submitted a design review appli- cation for the construction of a custom single-family home which is not in conformity with the approved guidelines, The applicant requests to increase the ridge height from 23 feet to 26 feet and to use a different roofing material than is allowed by the design guidelines. The applicant wishes to use barrel tile instead of flat tile. The applicant proposes to amend the PUD to allow the design of his home to incorporate those differing elements and to amend the design review process to allow the Zoning Administrator to review and approve the proposed custom home. This application was originally submitted as a minor modification to the approved PUD (PUD- 01). An information report was submitted to the City Council on September 19,2006, Coun- cilmember Sullivan noted the issues that the EBRPD had at the time of the original approval and requested that this application be referred to the Planning Commission for review as a major modification. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested modification, and the application is being brought to the Council for decision. SITE DESCRIPTION The subject site is a vacant, relatively flat lot adjacent to the Arroyo del Valle and Shadow Cliffs Regional Park to the north and northeast of the subject site. To its immediate east and west are the four other lots of the subdivision. To its south is Vineyard Avenue and properties covered by the Vineyard A venue Corridor Specific Plan, PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed modification include the following: 1. To increase the maximum building height for this lot from 23 feet to 26 feet; 2. To allow a barrel tile roof in place of the flat roof tile required by the PUD approval; 3. To allow second story windows to face the direction of the Shadow Cliffs Regional Rec- reation Area; and, 4. To allow design review approval by the Zoning Administrator by noticing the Planning Commission of the application, notifying the Planning Commission of the decision of the Zoning Administrator, and to provide a 20-day appeal period, ANALYSIS On September 1,2006 the applicant requested the City review a minor modification to PUD-Ol for Items 1-4 noted above under the project description, Knowing the concerns that the EBRPD had at the time of the original approval, staff referred the application to the EBRPD to determine if it could support the applicant's request. SR:06:270 Page 3