SR 06:245 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mirador Court; 9) second floor plan illustrating two casement windows on the east elevation, 10) elevations illustrating the transom windows on the rear (south) and two casement windows on the side (east) elevations; and 11) additional building sections of the subject property. The items listed above are reflected on the site plans, dated "Received June 5, 2006", presented before the Planning Commission (Exhibit A). The subject property is zoned R-I-6,500 (Single-Family Residential District). As shown in the table below, the proposed project would adhere to the site development standards of this district. Applicable Standards for Additions in the R-1-6,500 Zoning District Standards for Required Proposed Pleasanton Municipal R-1-6,500 Code Compliance F .A.R. 40% max. 39.4% ./ 15ft min. for side entry 15 ft side entry garage Front Yard Setback garage ./ 20ft min. for main house 20ft to main house One / Both 5ft / 12ft min. 8ft /16ft Side Yard Setbacks ./ Rear Yard Setback 5ft min. covered patio 16ft covered patio ./ 20ft min. main house 25ft main house 30ft max. (as measured Height from grade to the 24ft (at highest point) ./ midpoint of the roof) 17ft min. or 20ft min. if No change to side yard Side Yard Separation changing the side yard ./ setbacks setbacks Driveway 24ft maximum curb cut 24ft curb cut width ./ width Shadow Analvsis As illustrated in the shadow study, found in Exhibit A, the second-story addition would have a minimal affect on 787 Mirador Court. During the winter and summer months a small portion of the northwest portion of the neighboring property would have a shadow cast on it. The shadowing on the property would not deprive the property owners of future solar panels, should they be desired, or create more of a shadow than currently exists from the mature trees along the east elevation of the subject property. Since the houses located directly behind the subject property have higher building pad elevations, approximately 12-feet, the proposed second-story would have little, if any, affect on those properties. Staff would like to note that if7-foot solid fences were constructed along the rear of the subject property and adjacent neighboring property, those would have more of an affect on the properties than the second-story due to the elevation change in topography of approximately 12-feet, existing bank and fence heights (please see the line of sight drawing in Exhibit A). PAP-93, AppealofPADR-1472 Planning Commission Page 6 of 15