My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:245
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:245
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2006 12:28:34 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 12:20:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/7/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:245
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Two-Storv Homes on Mirador Court <br /> <br />As previously mentioned, the subject neighborhood is comprised of single and two-story additions, <br />please see Exhibit C. Staff notes that there are three two-story homes on Mirador Court, 771, 786, and <br />795; please see Exhibit O. This is an older neighborhood (1959) and there are few public records <br />regarding original construction. Since staff is unsure whether these houses were constructed, originally <br />or with additions, as two-story's, there are no mitigations required for this addition. Like the subject <br />property, the three two-story homes on Mirador Court have lower elevation-building pads than the <br />houses' located to the rear of the properties. <br /> <br />PROJECT DESCRIPTION <br /> <br />The Administrative Design Review process is required for additions to single-family residences. Upon <br />receiving the application, the proposed project is checked for conformity with the required development <br />standards for the zoning district, compatibility of the proposal with the existing structure, and any <br />potential effects on neighboring properties. Notices are sent to all adjacent property owners and other <br />parties who may be visually or physically affected by the project. If no one requests a Zoning <br />Administrator hearing within seven days ofthe noticing, the project is approved or conditionally <br />approved. In this case, a request for a Zoning Administrator hearing was made. <br /> <br />The Georgatos' (the appellants) appealed the Zoning Administrator's approval of the application to <br />allow the Knights' (the applicants) to construct the following: 1) an approximately 180 square-foot <br />covered patio; 2) an approximately 229 square-foot first floor addition on the rear; and 3) an <br />approximately 1,251 square-foot second story addition over the garage and new living room area and <br />extend across approximately one half of the existing home. The addition would be located in the <br />northeastern and southern portion of the lot. The first floor addition would include relocating and <br />expanding a new covered patio and living room. The second floor addition would include a new master <br />bedroom and bath, 2 bedrooms, and a bathroom. <br /> <br />The applicants also plan to expand the driveway pad and construct a new parking pad. A condition of <br />approval was added and approved by the Zoning Administrator that the applicants shall plant vegetation <br />on both sides of the driveway pad along the west elevation, in order to soften the appearance and <br />maintain an attractive street fa~ade. The applicants also plan to enhance the front and side elevations of <br />their existing house by changing the materials and colors of these elevations. In the R -1-6,500 Zoning <br />District, fayade material and color changes, such as those proposed, and the new expanded driveway is <br />not subject to Administrative Design Review approval. <br /> <br />ANALYSIS <br /> <br />Since the original submittal, the architect has made some plan revisions: 1) the actual lot size is 7,815 <br />square-feet and not 8,378 square-feet; 2) the existing square-footage of the home is 1,542 and not 1,396 <br />square-feet; 3) the first floor addition is actually 292 square-feet and not 441 square-feet, therefore <br />changing the proposed FAR from 36.8% to 39.4%; 4) the driveway parking pad area is approximately <br />50 square-feet smaller; 5) the second story addition is in fact setback 20-feet and therefore meets the <br />front yard setback for the R-I-6,500 zoning district; 6) site plan that includes a partial building footprint <br />of 787 Mirador Court; 7) cross section illustrating the height of the power poles, change of elevation of <br />the subject property, and a line of site drawing from 790 East Angela; 8) shadow analysis of787 <br /> <br />PAP-93, AppealofPADR-1472 <br /> <br />Planning Commission <br /> <br />Page 5 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.