My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:245
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:245
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2006 12:28:34 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 12:20:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/7/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:245
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ms. Decker expressed that this was a difficult process and said that she would like to hear <br />comments on new information or new concerns instead of repeating the known concerns and <br />testimony taken. <br /> <br />The Georgatos' stated that their concerns have not changed. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker stated that the graphic picture that Mr. Shutts submitted does not reflect the existing <br />trees and that the majority of the windows and part of the addition on the east elevation will be <br />screened by those mature trees. <br /> <br />Mr. Shutts said that he took the picture that was presented by the Georgatos' at the last hearing, <br />scaled if off to where the addition would occur, and illustrated the accuracy of what the addition <br />would look like. <br /> <br />Mrs. Georgatos asked if the story poles that were previously constructed were accurate. <br /> <br />Mr. Shutts said that the story poles were higher than the line of site. He said that standing in <br />their house, the story poles represented a worse position of the addition. <br /> <br />Mrs. Georgatos said that the addition would extend farther than the triangle vent on the existing <br />house. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker indicated on the picture and the site plan how far over the addition would go and <br />stated that it was a little more than 50% of the existing house. <br /> <br />Mrs. Georgatos asked if it extends farther to the west and would like to see it on the picture were <br />the addition would stop. <br /> <br />Mr. Shutts said that the angle of the picture prevents seeing where the triangle vent is on the <br />existing roof that Mrs. Georgatos was asking about, but pointed out where he believed it was. <br /> <br />Mr. Shutts said that he has had a number of discussions with what could be done, such as <br />changing the windows in the master bedroom to have a 5' 112" to 6-foot windowsill and putting <br />windows on the side of the master bedroom to allow for light and ventilation with a film over the <br />windows. Mr. Shutts drew on the picture to show what the windowsill would look like at 6-feet. <br /> <br />Mrs. Georgatos said that even with the 6- foot windowsill height, they could still see on to their <br />property. <br /> <br />Mr. Shutts said that the lowest point of the window would start at 6-feet and all the applicants <br />would be able to see is the sky because of the difference in elevations between the two <br />properties. <br /> <br />Mr. Knight suggested that two small windows could be placed on the side elevations towards <br />Martha's house and the other next-door neighbor. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker asked if that would mitigate the Georgatos' concerns. <br /> <br />Minutes: PADR-1472 <br /> <br />Page 3 of5 <br /> <br />April 13, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.