My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:242
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:242
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2006 2:05:17 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:09:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/17/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:242
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Meadowlark Development - Austin Property - Environmental Checklist <br /> <br />dards; however, it is required that all construction equipment meet all current exhaust standards <br />for emission reductions to maintain compliance to the NOx. To mitigate short-term construction <br />impacts, the project will bc rcquircd to provide dust control measures to reduce dust cmissions <br />and PMIO: <br /> <br />. Enclose, cover or water all soil piles twice daily, <br />. Water all haul roads twice daily, <br /> <br />Long-term operational emissions would be generated by both stationary and mobile sourccs as a <br />result of normal day-to-day activities on site subsequcnt to construction completion. Stationary <br />area source emission would be generated by the consumption of natural gas for space (HV AC) <br />and water heating devices and operation of landscape maintenance equipment. Mobile source <br />emissions would bc generated by motor vehicles traveling to and from the project site, <br /> <br />The proposed residential development will result in small, incremental insignificant incrcases. <br />Residential developmcnt is subject to the City's Growth Management Policies, which are consis- <br />tent with the area wide air quality management plan. Therefore, this will be a less-than- <br />signijicant-impact, <br /> <br />e) The proposed project will result in the construction of rcsidential uses and the dedication of open <br />space land to the City and will not result in producing objectionable odors. Thercforc, this will <br />be a less-than-signijicant-impact. <br /> <br />4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES <br /> <br />Environmental Sctting <br /> <br />Wetlands are regulated under federal, state and local laws, regulations and policies, Primary wetland <br />regulatory compliance is undcr the federal Clean Water Act, the California Departmcnt of Fish and <br />Game (CDFG), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and California Environmental Qual- <br />ity Act (CEQA). <br /> <br />The Clean Water Act requires avoidance of wetlands whenever a practicable alternative exists, For un- <br />avoidable impacts, the regulatory agencies have policies calling for mitigation to provide "no net loss" <br />of acreagc or habitat value. Under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, a permit must be obtained for <br />the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters ofthc Unitcd States, <br /> <br />Under the CDFG code, Sections 1601-1607 regulate projects with divert, obstruct, or change the natural <br />flow, bed, channel, or bank of a river, stream, or lake. Proponents of such projects must notify CDFG <br />and entcr into a streambed alteration agreement. CDFG normally exerts jurisdiction over natural <br />streams and artificial channels that have habitat value for wildlife species, The jurisdiction extends to <br />the bank top. <br /> <br />Standards of Significance <br /> <br />For purposes of this environmental document, an impact is considered significant if the proposed project <br />would: <br /> <br />PGPA-ll/PUD-58/PTR-7813 <br /> <br />Page 15 of36 <br /> <br />July 19,2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.