Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit I <br /> <br /> COSTING EXAMPLES OF FEES <br />CATEGORY METHODOLOGY IN CATEGORY <br />A. Impact Fees Based on capital costs of City Residential construction fee <br /> infrastructure impacted by Capital improvement fee <br /> proposed development. Sewer connection fee <br /> Developed within AB1600 Water connection fee <br /> guidelines from State. Growth management fee <br /> "Affordable Housing' fee <br />B. Improper Behavior Full City costs plus penalty Traffic fines or parking enforcement <br /> amount where appropriate. Theft, willful destruction of property <br /> Vandalism <br />C. Control of Potentially Full cost recovery. Fire Inspection Fees <br />Harmful Activities Pawn Shop Permits <br /> Building Inspection Fees <br />D. Services to/for an Full cost recovery. Planning or Engineering work <br />individual or group ~ssociated with processing of s <br />and enterprise fund subdivision map, building permits, or <br />activities Public R/W Company's exclusive rental <br /> of facility Water/Sewer monthly charges <br /> non-willful harm to City property <br />E. Service Supporting Out-of-pocket cost recovery. Recreation Fee (unless facilities <br />General City Policy therefore not available to general public) <br /> Safety Training (CPR, fire prevention) <br />F. Normal City Services No charge. Street Maintenance, P~k Maintenance, <br /> law enforcement, fire response, etc. <br /> <br />In addition to, and overriding the above categories ar~ enterprise fund activities. These are <br />typically similar to category four above, in that the City would recover all of its costs and <br />overhead. However, with enterprise funds including Water and Sewer, the capital costs required <br />to support the activity are typically significant, and it is the City's policy to recover their costs <br />directly from the users of the enterprise fund services. This includes depreciation or other <br />method of provision for capital facility replacement. No other City services would normally <br />include provision for replacement of capital facilities. <br /> <br />C. MAINTENANCE OF FEE LEVELS <br /> <br />The Policy of the City is to maintain fees at a level consistent with the costs associated <br />with each service. To accomplish this, the City will: <br /> <br />1. Annual departmental submission of recommended fees. <br /> <br />Each department is directed every November to review its costs associated with <br />each existing fee for service and to determine whether it has added any services <br />during the year, or is contemplating adding any services in the upcoming fiscal <br /> <br />City of Pleasantou <br />Fee Policy <br /> <br />Page 3 May 1992 <br /> <br /> <br />