Laserfiche WebLink
ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES c Commissioners Berger , Hov i ngh , Hoyt and Cha i rma n <br />Michelotti <br />NOES o Commissioner Mahern <br />ABSENT : None <br />ABSTAIN. None <br />Re s o 1 iit i on No _ PCD- 8 9 - 2 O wa s entered and adopted recommending <br />app rova 1 0 £ the Negative Dec 1 a rat i on a s motioned _ <br />Re s o 1 ut i on No _ PC - 8 9 - 2 1 wa s entered and adopted recommending <br />approva 1 o f Ca s e PUD- 8 9- 1 3 a s motioned _ <br />PUD- 8 9 - 2 Richards /Pries <br />App l i cat ion o £ Chet Richards and .Tess i e Pries for development p l an <br />approva 1 to construct a twelve -unit apartment complex to be <br />1 ocated on an approx imate 1y 2 _ 8 acre s ite at 1 O 4 5 D iv i s ion S treet _ <br />Z on ing for the property i s PUD ( Planned Unit Development ) - Med ium <br />Density Res ident is 1 D i str i ct _ <br />Mr _ Quag Z i a p resented the sta f f report recommending approva 1 o f <br />th i s case _ <br />Commissioner Mahern a sked what happened to the p rev i ou s l y app roved <br />prof ect f or th i s s ite a nd whethe r or not i t d i do • t go f o rth <br />becau s e o f the c ons t ra i nt s p 1 aced by Z one 7_ Mr _ Qu ag Z i a <br />responded that there wa s s lope s tab i i i z at i on problems , but the new <br />owners fee l more com fort ab l e w i th the cored it i on s imposed _ <br />The pub l i c he a r e ng wa s opened _ <br />M i cha e 1 Go 1 d swo rthy , 7 8 M i s s i on Drive , P1 e a s anton , s tated that <br />tYi i s s ame p roj ect wa s b e fo re the P 1 a nn i ng Commission i n Ju 1 y 1 9 8 7_ <br />The new developers do not have any problems w i th the new or o l d <br />condition s and they are mere 1 y a sk i ng for a reapp rova 1 o f the <br />project _ <br />Comm i s s i one r Hov ingh a sked the height o f the proj ect _ Mr _ Swift <br />stated that the p l an s show 2 9. 6 •• t o 3 1•_ <br />Mr _ Go 1 dsworthy s aid the proj ect wa s designed t o f it i nt o the o l d <br />town atmosphere and 1 oo}c l i ke the home s on D iv i s i on and S t _ Mary <br />Streets _ <br />The pub t i c hearing wa s c 1 o s ed _ <br />A motion wa s made by Commissioner Mahern , s ec onded by Comm i s s i on e r <br />Hoyt ( 1) f i nd i ng that a Negative Dec 1 a rat i on i s appropriate f o r <br />th i s c a s e i na smuch a s p ro j ect app rova l w i 1 1 have an i n s i gn i f i c a nt <br />adve r s e e f f e ct o n the environment ; ( 2) that the development p l an <br />i s consistent w ith the Genera l Plan a nd the purpose s o f the PUD <br />- 1 8 - <br />