My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 02/22/89
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
PC 02/22/89
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2017 10:45:57 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 3:04:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/22/1989
DOCUMENT NAME
02/22/89
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr _ Bridgman responded that they started out w ith 3 8 l of s and a re <br />slow down to 3 5 _ They tooK two o £ £ o f the s t re et that b a cKS up to <br />Kentwood _ They are proposing 1 a rger 1 of s than what a re in the <br />existing a rea . None o f the s e l of s a re the standard 6 5 0 0 s q_ ft _ <br />1 of s i z e_ The i t 1 of s range i n s i z e £rom ove r 7 0 0 0 s q_ £t _ to <br />1 5 ~ O O O s q _ ft _ They agree to work out the percentage o £ 1 of <br />cove rage with sta f f at tentative map stage _ <br />Mr _ Quag 1 i a reported that the C ity Yea s conditions regarding <br />construction start up t ime ~ du s t contro 1 and grading _ As the <br />conditions a re necessary ~ they w i 1 1 be recommended at the <br />tentative map stage _ <br />Chairman M i the 1 ott i a sKed £ or a comparison regarding the standard <br />condition s o £ approve 1 p ropo s ed by sta £ £ and 1 attar received o £ <br />the neighbors w i th a data i led request o f coed it i on s _ Mr _ Swift <br />responded by s ay i ng s ome o £ the conditions c ou 1 d be i nc orpo ra t ed <br />wh i 1 e there a re at l east two that cannot app l y bec au s e t o do s o <br />wou 1 d not be 1 ega 1 _ <br />C omm i s s i one r Mahe rn wou 1 d 1 ilce to s ee the number o f 1 of s reduced <br />becaus e o f the f 1 0o r a rea rat i o a nd c ou 1 d not support the project <br />un l e s s th i s i s a ccomp 1 i shed _ <br />Comm i s s i one r Berger made a motion ~ s econded by Comm i s s i one r Hoyt <br />that ( 1) the negative de c 1 a rat i on prepared £or Ca s e PUD- 8 8- 1 3 b e <br />app roved i na smuch a s app nova 1 0£ th i s project wou 1 d have a n <br />i n s i gn i£ i cant advers e e f f act on the environment ~ ( 2) the <br />Commission f i nds that the deve 1 opment p 1 an i s c on s i stmt w i th the <br />Genera l P l an and purpose s o f the PU D Ordinance ~ and ( 3 ) that the <br />project be recommended fo r app rove 1 subject t o the conditions o f <br />the sta £ £ report w ith the £0 1 1 ow i ng modifications <br />Add C and it i on 2 1 a s £0 1 1 ows <br />That a n a rcha eo 1 og i ca 1 study o f the s ite be comp 1 eted and <br />submitted pr i o r to the tentative map _ <br />Add S ant ante to Condition 6 a s fo 1 1 ows c <br />The m in imum eastern s ideya rd s etba cK on 1 of s 2 7 and 3 5 she 1 1 b e <br />17 • _ <br />Renumb e r the existing Condition No _ 2 1 a s 2 2_ <br />- 1 7 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.