Laserfiche WebLink
= n re spore s e t o Commissioner Mi the 1 ott i • s question regarding how <br />1 ots ca n be mod i f i ed , Mr _ Sw i ft r ep 1 i ed that the 1 of <br />con figuration c an be mod i f i ed s omewhat , but must st i 1 1 c on f orm to <br />the approved PUD _ <br />Commissioner Horan a sked why the current over 1 ay requirement s on <br />Footh i 1 1 Road i s not app 1 i cab 1 e to th i s app 1 i cat i on _ Mr _ Sw i ft <br />responded they ar a not app 1 icab 1 e becaus a the ord irlanc a adopting <br />those, specifically ••grandfath ered•• this PUD_ That was one of <br />the options sta f f gave the Commission , they could have made it a <br />requirement or not , and he reca 1 1 ed the i r r ecommendat i on wa s t o <br />allow it to be ••grandf athered_ •• <br />THE PUBL Z C HEARSNG iiAB OPENED . <br />Mike Cooper o f Cooper C iv i 1 Engineers , 3 4 2 2 W i necourt Way , S an <br />Jose , r epre s ent ed the app 1 i cat i on _ He put up a drawing o f the <br />tentative map f or d i sp 1 ay _ He thanked sta £ £ f or a 1 1 the worK <br />done i n the 1 a st 1 1 / 2 year on the project _ He went to the <br />drawing and pointed out the changes made f rom the or ig i zla 1 2 3 <br />1 of s to 2 2 one being e 1 im i Hated from the cents 1 bench area _ He <br />exp t a i reed that the e 1 im i nat i on o f that one 1 of a l l owed the <br />existing pads to be further s spar aced and a 1 s o permitted mor e <br />f 1 ex ib i 1 ity a s t o necessary grading _ He pointed out that 1 of no _ <br />1 Yea s changed in con figuration , w ith the most s ign i f i c a nt change <br />being on the north kno 1 1 _ He noted revisions resulted in a <br />hammerhead turnaround wh i ch reduced grading ne ce s s it i e s and th e <br />height o f the r et a i n ing wa 1 1_ A 1 1 change s have be en approved by <br />the F i r e Marsha 1 1_ Mr _ Cooper a l s o pointed out that 1 of s 1 <br />through 3 8 and 9 a re shown on the map a s not graded ~ however , <br />the intent i s t o grade the 1 ots a s they ar e bu i 1 t upon _ At that <br />time they w i 1 1 be i red iv i dua 1 1y reviewed _ <br />Mr _ Cooper pointed out that a water study wa s done on the <br />application_ He has met with Lee Montgomery who lives on the <br />adjacent property and w i th other surrounding property owner s i n <br />r egard t o the 1 ocat i on o£ a water t ank _ He r e f err ed t o a 1 ett er <br />from Mr _ Montgomery that conf i rms h i s approva 1 _ He noted that <br />the water t ank w i 1 1 not be necessary unt i 1 pha s e 2 i s bu i 1t _ <br />= n r egard to tr e e r emova 1 , Mr _ Cooper noted that i n the mo s t <br />recent con figuration and s ince the 1 a st tree report wa s done tha t <br />some add i t i ona 1 tree s w i 1 1 be s aved , wh i 1 e other s thought to be <br />healthy n ow app ear to be s 1 at ed f or remova 1 _ <br />Cha i rma n Mah ern a sked Mr _ Cooper to d i scus s the retaining wa 1 1 s _ <br />Mr _ Cooper pointed out the 1 oc at i on o f the wa 1 1 s , noting they a re <br />trying to a ch i eve wa 1 1 s that are not v i s i b l e from Fo oth i 1 1 Road _ <br />They are projected to be five foot terraced walls of a ••Keystone•• <br />nature _ He noted that on the new street , they w i 1 1 have s ome <br />MIMIIT ES PLANNING COMISSIOM OECEM~SER 12, 1990 PAGE S <br />