PC 12/12/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

5 3_ He a l s o noted that He id i K 1 i new Assistant P 1 anner had written the r ep ort and that she would be ab l e to answer question s that the Commission m i ght have _ Commissioner M i the 1 ott i requested c 1 ar i f i c at i on regarding Cored i t i on 5 3 a s to the e st imated cost _ Mr _ Sw i f t exp t a i reed that a preliminary e st imat e i red i cats s that the pro -rat a char e wou l d be about $ 6 ~ 1 8 5 _ Commissioner Hovi ngh expressed concern that when the PUD for this app 1 i cat i on wa s approved the Footh i 1 1 Road a 1 i gnment wa s s t i 1 1 i n h i atu s_ He a stied what the status o f the Footh i 1 1 Road a l ignore nt i s at the present t ime _ Mr _ Sw i ft explained the a 1 ignment i s sue w i 1 1 not be heard by C ity Counc i 1 unt i 1 s omet ime in January 1991_ However staff feels the recommended conditions meet the spirit o f what the Commission desire s £ or the Footh i 1 1 Road a 1 ignment ~ even though there i s much uncertainty a bout the f ina 1 st atu s o f the a 1 ignment _ Commissioner Hov ingh a sKed s to f f whether the north ~ntr anc e o f the proposed project wou 1d be put on ho 1d unt i 1 the Footh i 1 1 Road a l i gnme nt i s f i n a l_ Ms _ K line s aid that th i s i s sue wou l d be put on ho 1d f or further consideration _ Commissioner McGU i r3c a slced whether there i s any p articular p l an for the r sore i n i ng 3 5_ 1 6 acre s that w i 1 1 be d iv ided i nto 1 3 parts 1 s_ Ms _ K 1 i ne r e sponded that part i cu 1 ar property i s current 1y d iv i ded i nto f our parts 1 s that are projected f or op e n space ~ a r ecre at i on center ~ and pr ivat e streets _ Sh e noted that a l l the open space p ar c e l s w i 1 1 have the s ame r e s tr i ct i on s a s the other parcels _ Commissioner Wright a sKed the grade o f the existing r oad on the site _ Ms _ K 1 i ne s aid she d id not have de finite f i gur e s at th e moment ~ but thought it wa s 1 6 to 1 8 _ Cha i rma n Mah ern noted that th i s 1 5 an approved PUD w 1 th 2 2 1 of s_ She a sKed i £ they c an do anything about the approved number o f 1 of s _ Mr _ Sw i f t s aid they wou 1 d have to f i red that the t ent at ive map they ar e reviewing i s consistent w ith the PUD and the cored i t i ores with i n it _ There are s ome c and it i on s that wou l d a l l ow mod i f i cat i on to the PUD , such a s, i f one p articular l of r equ i t ed remove 1 0 £ to o many trees ~ that they cou 1 d s ay e 1 im i net e that 1 of ~ or i f a part i cu 1 ar 1 of d i d not have the f ina 1 grade that wa s necessary _ However ~ sta f f d id not f ind any k ind o f such conditions on the s i t e _ MINUTES PLARMIMG GOMIII SSI O~ UEC~MBER 72, 7~J0 PACE ~.