My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 10/24/1990
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
PC 10/24/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2017 3:46:43 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:46:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/24/1990
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 10/24/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 oo7c wou 1d be a product or p r o j e ct th a t wa s i nv i t i ng to tho s e <br />c om i ng i nt o th e C i ty _ <br />Commissioner Wright c oncurr ed w i th C omm i s s i on e r Horan • s c omment s_ <br />He reiterated th at he ha s drive n up a nd down the f re eway a number <br />o£ t ime s and can bare 1 y s e e th e Canyon Meadows project , and d i d <br />not £ ee 1 the proposed p r o j e c t wou l d be s e en a ny mor e than tlza t_ <br />What he s ee s f r om the £ re eway i s the upl-i i 1 1 s i de o£ Dub l i n Canyon <br />Road a nd thought p erhap s the t s i de c ou l d be treated a s <br />Commissioner Micheiotti wanted with houses spread Out and lots of <br />trees _ <br />A motion wa s mad e by Commissioner M i ch e 1 ott i, s e corded by <br />Commissioner Hov i ngh de ny i ng appr ova l o £ th e Gen era l P l an <br />amendment as filed under case GP-90-7 For the reasons stated <br />during the hearing _ <br />ROLL CALL VOT E <br />AYES . Commissioner s H ov i ngh , Mc Gu i rK , a nd M i the 1 ott i <br />NOES c C omm i s s i o ne r Ho r a n a nd Chairman Ma he rn <br />ABSENT . N o n e <br />AB STA= N a N on e <br />Re s o t ut i on No _ P C- 9 0- 9 7 wa s e nt e r e ct a nd a d op t ed d eny i ng the <br />app 1 i cat i on F o r a the Gen e r a 1 P l a n amendment a s f i t ed under Ca s e <br />GP - 9 0- 7 a s mot ioned _ <br />Mr _ Swift requested that even though the previous case was <br />denied , i t wou 1 d be he 1p f u 1 i F th e C omm i s s i on gave the i t c omment s <br />For the record i n c a s e PUD - 9 0- 1 3 i s a pp e a 1 e d t o the C i ty C ounc i 1_ <br />Commissioner Ho r a n s a i d th a t a s s um i ng th e G e n e r a l P l a n Pied been <br />amended, his comments would Piave been that Pie is considerably <br />concerned w i th th e FAR _ H e wou l d Pia v~ c o n s i d er ed a ny d i s cus l i o n <br />about reducing the d e n s i ty w i th i n th e medium density _ He d i d not <br />]chow about the 3 1 versus the 2 1 slope, but would Piave been <br />satisfied with waiting until the tentative map stage Pied been <br />reacPied_ He would Favor a low to mid-30 unit range for the <br />proposed project _ S n a dd i t i o n, h e f e l t th a t th e <br />range o£ $ 3 5 0, 0 0 0 wa s t o o h i gh _ Projected pr i c e <br />Comm i s s i on e r McGU i rK f e l t tPia t i n r eg a n d t o the FAR , to e pr opo s a d <br />project would be overbuilt _ He £e1t that the 2 _ 3 amenity called <br />the cr e e]c a r e a a nd pushing eve ryth i n g e l s e t ogether t o g i ve more <br />open sp ac e wa s n o t h i s i d e a o f a t r a d e o f f_ He s a i d h e 1 i Ke s th e <br />concept o f the h ou s e s bu t F e l t th e d e n s i ty wa s t o o h i gh _ I n <br />regard t o tr a F£ i c i s s u e s, h e F e l t th a t t h e p resent D 1 eve 1 o f <br />tra ££ i c wa s n of the t g o od a nd the t p e op 1 e a r e j u s t t o t era t i ng i t_ <br />He F e l t i t need s t o be i mp r oved s o th a t i t i s not a Tway s o n the <br />br i nlc o£ over l o a d w i th e a ch a dd i t i on a 1 p r o j e c t_ <br />- 1 1 - <br />. _.. _. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.