PC 10/24/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner M i cri e 1 ott i s a i d sh e i s opposed t o a Genera 1 P l a n amendment f or a numbs r o f reasons _ The Ferrer i project wa s supposed to be a n i s o 1 a t ed c a s e, but i t i s n of supposed to be the beginning o £ mad ium or 1 ow density a 1 ong the Dub 1 i n Canyon corridor _ S i n c e the comp 1 et i o n o f the F e r r e r i project , many pe op l e nave s a i d that wa s a m i s t aKe _ S he f e l t that i£ the General Plan is amended that another mistake might be made with the proposed project _ She wou l d 1 iKe t o s e e the property rema i n a s c l o s e to i t s natur a 1 state a s i t i s now , w i th no grading and a 1 ow density designation _ Sh e d i d not want t o s e e the s oundwa 1 1 from 5- 5 8 0 wh i ch i s wh a t i s proposed f or th e project _ She agreed with staff • s rec ommend a t i o n a s t o th e d en i a 1 0£ th e Genera l P l a n amendment _ Criairman Mahern also felt the Ferrari/Canyon Ma~dowS project was a m i state _ However , she wondered wh eth er i t wou l d be w i s es to put h ome s such a s s ugg e s t e d by Comm i s s i o n e r M i ch e 1 ott i or sta f f or even the pr ev i ou s l y a pp r owed G o o cri - s ty l e h ou s e, next t o a h i gh density projact_ She has come to the conclusion that she can support the G enter a l P l a n amendment i f th ey c ou l d make i t a PUD or have s oma r e a 1 1 imitation s on th e units _ Sh e agreed the proposed project wa s t o o d en s e, but c ou 1 d c onside r s ometh i ng l e s s, a s she had suggested e ar 1 i a r_ She wou 1 d n of want t o s e e j u s t r o o t op s i n driving by , but s ome th i ng tri a t i s mo r e open _ She £ a 1 t something had to be done to feather away from the mistake that had been made , and £ a 1 t that g o i ng t o a medium d en s i ty p r o j ect doe s make s ens e i n th i s c a s a_ C omm i s s i o ne r M i cri a 1 o tt i a s ke d Cries i rma n Ma ri e r n h ow she f e l t a bout seeing soundwall on both sides _ Chairman Mal-fern said she did not think they wou l d ever s e e th e project o f 4- 5 house s the t Commissioner M i cri e 1 ott i wou 1 d £ avor , a nd £ a 1 t that tri ay wou 1 d have s oundwa 1 1 s t o c onside r o n a ny p r o j e c t tri ey have t o c on s i der for that area _ Commissioner H o r a n added th a t he d i d n of think th e s oundwa 1 1 wou 1d be a s o btru s i ve a s d ep i s to d by C omm fi s s i o n ar M i the 1 ott i_ Comm i s s i one r McGU i rK s t at ed the t h a d i d n of s upport the Genera 1 P l a n amendment change , a s h e wa s c o nc ~ r ned a bout wh a t m i ght riappen in the future i£ it were changed _ He felt that in doing s o, they wou l d s imp l y be c over i ng tri e m i s t aK e s mad e i n the Canyon Meadow project _ He d i d n of think th e p r op o s e d project gave a £ aatrier i ng e f f e c t a nd f e l t th a t i t c ou 1 d be moved down s omewhat away from the f r e away i n o rd a r t o be l e s s v i s i b l e a s a n entry to the City _ Commissioner Horan s a i d he c ou 1 d s upp or t tri e Genera 1 P l a n amendment change be c au s e he doe s believe i n the f e ether i ng affect _ He was o£ the opinion that the ••riorse backyard dusty tramp 1 ad 1 0 ok •• on the a d j a c ent n e a r by property wa s not a be aut i f u 1 entr a n c e t o tri e C i ty _ H e F e l t th a t a mor e a ttr a ct five - 1 O - _..___. __. .. _. _..T _.. _ _-.___. .. _.. __. _..