PC 09/22/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

al so concerned ab oa_at what woa..al d happen i f Mr. McDowel 1 were no 1 on g e r t h e d e v e l o p er Chairman Maherra agreed with staff's desire for a denser planting o f g rapes . S h e B u g g es t ed t h a t s e v er a l o f t h e l o t s b e d e l et ed i n o r d e r t o p r ov i d e m or e r oom f o r g rap a v i n e s_ Mr . Mc Dow e l l w a s opposed t o t h i s, a n d s a i d i t w ou l d n o t b e c o s t- e f f e c t i v e t o t a k e away any of the 1 ots. He sai d staf f recommendati on i s to cl a_amp t h e g r ape s mor a i n on a a r e a: h o w e v er ~ h e d i d n o t w i s h t o d o t hat . Chairman Mahern questi or>ed whether the Conti r>ual retention and m a i n t en an c e o f t h e g rap a v i n e s c oo l d b e c o n t r o l l e d b y t h e G GBeR s Com m i s s i one r Mc C~ u i r 4s a s k ed M r M c Dowe l 1 wh e t h e r h i s Archi tecta-aral Control Commi ttae 1-~as shown tl-aa proposed 1 ayout to t h e De s i g n R ev i e w Board . Mr . Mc D o we 1 1 e x p l a i n e d ti a h a s b een bef ore Design Rc=view and tY~ey gave approved everything tl"~at i s shown t on fi g h t Commi ssi one r Mc G u 3 r k a s k e d i f Mr . Mc D ow e l l h a s a p r e l i m i r~ a r- y plan i n case he Yeas to have a reduction of units because of p r o p e r t y n ee d e d f o r- t h e t r a i l s y s t e m. T h e a p p l i c a n t s a i d h e t~ a s d o n e s o me p r e l i m i n a r y wo r k-. r e g a r d i n g L o t s '6 a n d =~ sh o u l d a reduction of a_anits be necessary. It appears they would probably h i v e t o h a v e s h a l l ower h o u s e s or s m a l l e r one s o n t h o s e l o t s. I f i t went to 2C> f t _ f or the easement that Zone 7 typical 1 y needs., h e s a i d i t w ou l d e l i m i n a t e t h e p r o j ~c t. Mr . S w i f t s a i d t h a t Z o n e 7 i s t akin g a h ands - o f f p o s i t i o n r e g a r d i n g t h e m a t t e r: t h e y nog^mal 1 y require 2'O f t . f or an easement ., but perhaps i t may riot b e n e c e s s a r y. Lengthy di scussi on en sa..aed regarding the easement grid trai 1 system . Chairman M a h er r-a s a i d i t a p p e ar s t h a t w h a t t h e ap p l i c an t p r e f er s i ra s t e a d o f t h e c on d i t i o n t h a t t h e p r o f ec t b eg i n t h e s a me t i me a s the contract i s 1 et out f or the realignment of Vineyard Avent..ae ~ wool d be a counter condition that each homeowner pay i nto a f and that cor>tri bt_at es to the realigr~ment of Vi r>eyard through the of h e r p eo p l e s p r op er t y. Mr . M c Dow e l l s a i d t Y> e i r i tl e a w o u l d b e that when they go f or a bui 7. ding permi t they wot_al d have a f ee ~ in addition to all the normal fees, of perhaps ~iC>~OVC> a lot. Thi s wot_al d go 3 rito a f and f or the eventual real i gnmant of V i neyard Avenue_ I t wool d eventual 1 y be :~9CJ ~ C>U a~ f or the n i na propose d u nits _ I n r e s p on s e t o G't~ a i r m a n M ah er n s q u e s t i o n ., Mr . S w i f t s a i d t h e e s t i m a t ed c o s t o f r e a l i g n m en t t o V i n e y ar d i s in the range of ffi5-6C>O,C>C>C>., without right-of-way. Robert Gr-at-aam., 2503 Vineyard Avenues spoke in itavor- of ti->a p r o f ec t h e s t a t e d h e l i v e s n ea r t h e p r op os e d s i t e a n d M I NIJTES F'LANN I NG CUMM I SS ]: UN August 22 ~ 199t? F•age 7