My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 08/27/1990
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
PC 08/27/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2017 3:44:54 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:26:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/27/1990
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 06/27/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i ssa_aar~ce of bui 1 di ny permi is prior to the i r,terctiange <br />cor~structi on start--up _ <br />Gomn,i ssi or~er Hor arm addressed Condi ti ors 9 and iC> i n reg and to the <br />del ayi. ng of bui 1 d i ng permits anti 1 commencement of construction <br />on the Haci er,da i nt archar>ga_ He felt i t was not fair to imp act <br />the applicant i f con str-a_acti or, i s del eyed _ Di sca_assi on en sa_aed as <br />to the estimated ma>: i ma..a n, time bef ore i r~tarchange/freeway <br />construction would begin and the affects of delay upon the <br />app 1 i cant ' s project _ Mr _ Hi gdon said that the contracts have <br />already been awarded by the Ci ty c the contracts are out to the <br />cor-,t rac:tor for- si gni ng~ and the City a>:pects construction to <br />begin in July 1991_ <br />Commi ssi on er Mi chel att i stated she was not i n favor of rel a:: i- ng <br />Condition lr~p she also did not -Favor any neon lighting on the <br />rest aa_a r-ant_ She agreed with staf 4~ 's recommendation as to <br />pl ac cement o-f the par-ap at si gn _ - <br />Commi ssi on er Hovi ngh said he was not i n favor of havi ng any neon <br />lighting on the buildi ng_ <br />Commi ssi on ar I~Ic tier i c k said he was i n favor- of the neon tuba <br />1 i ghti ng on the restaurant and did not thi n Fc one ta_tbe would be <br />offer,si ve_ He agreed with staff 's recommendation as to <br />pl ac ement of the parapet sign _ <br />Commi ssi on er Wlah ern felt that thy. neon tubing was appropr i eta <br />for the r-est our ant_ <br />A mot i c>n was made by Commi ssi over tiovi ngh rec ommandi ng approval <br />of Casa PUD-8G-1.°_r~-7D subject to the 11 conditions of the staff <br />report _ <br />There was no sec:or,d to Commi ssi over Hovi ngh ' s motion _ <br />A motion was matle by G'omrni ssi on er Mah am ~ seconded by <br />Commi ssi on er Horan finding that the proposed project i s c-ov er ad <br />by the pr evi oa_as IVegati ve Declaration for "Measure X" ~ and <br />rec ommandi ng approval of Case PUD-SC->-1S-7D sub jcc_t to tl-,e <br />conditions of the s~t aff rap ort with the followirig modif icati once <br />1_ That Condi tior~ regarding neon lighting shall be <br />al imi net ad: <br />2 _ Tt-,at C:ondi t i on -... be modified to say that both si gns car, <br />be al 1 owed on thF= riorth and sot_eth par cep et _ <br />MINUTES <br />F~LANN I Nti COMMISSION <br />Ja_ane 27, i99C> <br />F"F' a g e 1 =3' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.