PC 08/27/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

bui 1 di ngs i n theme center- _ Mr _ Warner asked that_ he be al 1 owed to work wi tta staff reg ardi nq the styl e_ H¢ also r-eq nest ed that the neon 1 i ghti rag be r-etai ned , i n disagreement wi th st of f r ¢c ommend ati ons_ In addition, they have red uc ¢d the si gnage in order tv meet wi -th the conditions o-ft approval _ tie felt t. tae parapet. si gn staoul d be retained because he felt the bui 1 di ncq i s si tti ng 1 ower than the Steal 1 S¢rvi ce St ati on and their sign wvt_al d be ob sct_ar ed _ Mr _ Warner said tae teas no real problems with any of the conditions e>:cept Cor~di ti on 9, rel atir-aq to the Hacienda interchange. He felt that not bei rig ab 1 e to recei ve permi is anti 1 con str-uct i on start-up of the Hacienda i nterch an ge would i rnp act their application _ Mr _ Hi gdor-a said -that to tai s uradcr'st andi ng con struc_t i on i s supposed to start i n .7u1 y_ Commi ssi vn er Mat-tarn and Horan discussed the col or scheme of the bui 1 di ng with Mr _ Warner- _ Cornmi ssi on er- Mahern as4-ed the color of the proposed neon banding _ Mr _ Warner a>:pl ai ned there i s a pai rued band ar o~and the top of the ba_ai 1 di ng and i t would be i 1 7. i mi net ed by a whi to neon tubing which would ref 1 ¢ct the color of the bard. Commi ssi on er tior an as4ced the di mensi on of the tra~ah bin _ Mr _ Warner said i t wool d be at 1 east a b cubic yard bin _ He said a tra_tc tv woa_al d come and the bin woa_al d be rol 1 ed to the truck_ Steve Thomas , ~ 1 L>~a OaFc Road , Wal nut Creek: , stated that i n reg ar-d to -t tae Rar ap et si gn -t teat the rest aa_ar ant pad does sit 1 ow er than grade_ Ha al so would favor a removal or- a change of the condition cif approval tied into c-on str-ucti on star-t--up of the Hac_i ends i nterchange_ F-ie thought that even a wa=e4~s del ay coa._tl d be very cost ly_ James Mi 1 1 er , Camel of Coa..trt , st at eci he did not mi nd i f 'the restaurant was 1 ower than the rest of the bui 1 di ngs ore 1 ocat i on , bt_.at he was oppose-+d to any neon 1 i gtati ng _ Tta~_~ublic haasarino wad cl o~eci _. Commi ssi on er Hovi ngh st_app orted the conditions of approval _ tie did not support neon 1 i ghti ng: he al sv f ¢1 t that the si gnage rec ommeraded by st off was more ap pr opr late than that rec omrtaended by ~t tae T7esi gri Revi ew Commi ssi on _ Lomrtai ssi on er Mah ern favor ed si gnage as proposed by the appl ia_ar~Y__ Sh¢ felt the single ta_abe of neon bandir~g was not gaudy or glitzy, bt_tt is simply a nice accent to the ba_aildi ng and compl e>:_ She recognised the applicant' desire to have tail chosen col or scheme and said she could support that _ She was i n favor of 4:eepirag botl-a signs on the parapet, not on -t tae fasci a_ Stye did not sa_app ort any ctaange i n the condition reg ardi ng the MINUTES F'L_ANN I NC-a COIrIM I SS I C7N June 27, 199a7 Page 12