Laserfiche WebLink
A fte r d i s cus s i on ~ the genera 1 consensus wa s i n favo r o f <br />Option 2 and Alt e mat ive 2 and app rove 1 o f a s t ee r i ng <br />committee _ <br />Braude s wanted a c l e a r understanding that z on i ng wou 1 d b e <br />PUD-Agricultural with no more development than what is <br />existing _ <br />T a rve r - rea 1 i z a concern about contro 1 and what county c an <br />do _ N o objection t o steering c omm i tte e_ Prefer S O= f rom <br />LAFCO then g o t o annexation ~ then go to C i t i z en s • Comm itt ee _ <br />Fee 1 s o rder 1 y proc e s s wou 1 d be Option 1/Alternative 2_ <br />S ha rre 1 1 M i cha 1 ott i reque s tad c 1 a r i f i c at i on that the S to e r i ng <br />Committee b e d i re ct ed t o e stab 1 i sh p a ramete rs and i s sue s f o r <br />the C i t i z en s• C omm itt e e t o t a]ce up _ Mayo r Merc e r i nd i s aced <br />Chard t e r Le e wou l d meet w i th the s tee r i ng C omm i tte e and they <br />wou 1 d come ba cK w i th sta f f t ime and expense s n ec e s s a ry f o r <br />the s turfy ; not i fy the pub t i c how t o j o in the c omm i tta e and <br />the approximate time they would be through with the study _ <br />The Planning Commission would then maKe comments and the City <br />Counc i 1 wou 1 d maKe comments _ <br />It wa s moved by C ounc i lmembe r Braude s and s e c onded by <br />Counc i lmemb er But 1 er that a S t eer i ng C omm i ttae review a nd <br />bring to the P 1 ann ing Commission and c ity Coun c i 1 the <br />necessary i n fo rmat i on and recommendation s on s t a f f t ime and <br />money necessary fo r a C i t i z en s' Committee t o study p a rK an d <br />other 1 and u s e s w ith i n A l to rnat ive 2 and c oncurre nt 1 y, s t a f f <br />shoo 1 d proce s s the sphere o f i n f 1 uence extension t o <br />Alternative 2 with s imu 1 t a ne ous annexation and p rezoning t o <br />PUD-Ag r i cu 1 tuna 1 _ <br />FOOTH 2 LL CORRS DOR S TU DY <br />Mr _ Brand e s i nd i cat ed he c oncurred w i th reduction o f <br />driveways ~ but wa s n of c 1 ea r on v i ew stied ( s etb a cks on <br />Footh i 1 1) and h ow w i d e F o oth i 1 1 i s p rop o s ed t o b e i n c e rt a in <br />areas _ Agre ed there a re Bang ~rou s curve s and no sh ou 1 de r s <br />but i f th e road i s t oo s tra i ght and t o o w i de i t w i 1 1 maKe i t <br />a £ re away _ Pre £e r r i grit turn l a n e s rather than t o o w i de _ <br />As Kad i f there wa s a map ; Chanel 1 e r Lee produced a twe iv e £ o of <br />drawing o f the proposed road _ There wa s d i s cu s s i on on th e <br />width o f the ro a d and why i t wa s designated f ou r l a n e s i n <br />certain areas_ <br />The qu e st i on wa s raised a s to whether the C i ty cou 1 d a c qu i re <br />right o f way f o r f our 1 are s and on 1y bu i 1 d two 1 are s unt i 1 <br />four ware re a 1 1 y race s s a ry _ S to f f agreed th i s wa s p o n s ib 1 a_ <br />Page 6 <br />