PC 04/02/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ta rust - S upport change o £ S O S on 1 y ~ no annexat 3.on _ But 1 e r - have not heard opposition to a nn exat i on f rom property owners _ Not opposed to as much pa r]c land as p o n s ib 1 e_ Need t o work out s ome k i nd o f l and us e arrangement ~ but no need to get i nt o that now _ Horan - Support Option Z witl-i Alternative 3 i _ e _ Specific P 1 an w i th c r it i ca 1 u s e expression _ Pre £ er due t o nature 1 boundary o £ Pa 1 oma re s _ Berger - Support Alt _ 2 and S pe c i f i c P 1 an _ Me rce r i nqu i red i f s e 1 e ct Option 2, can the are a b e z oned PUD o r must they s e 1 e ct option 3_ Chanel 1 er Le e i nd i Gated c an us e PU D i n e ither a s 1 ong a s you g ive i t a 1 ab e 1_ Butt e r ru 1 eel out A 1 t e rnat ive 1 a nd 4: 2 or 3 i s okay ~ p re £e r z due to natural boundary and could wo rlc with views within th i s a re a _ Discussion ensued regarding whether P1 e a s ant on c out d a nnex portion de -annexed by Hayward d i rect l y w i thout going through County _ Mercer indicated Bruce Kern recommended property b e de -annexed to c ounty S 02 ~ study by T•p FC0 ~ then P1 ea s ant on cou 1 d make up it s m ind a s to what p o rt i on i t m i gl-it want t o annex _ The rest wool d stay in the c ounty _ Mohr had question s about the env i ronmenta l documents : c ou l d the county adopt P l e a s anton • s E SR ; i £ we go w ith Option 2 wou 1 d we 1 cave a s agr i cu 1 tura 1; and i£ th e C ity c e rt i£ i es it s E SR ~ c an the County s t i 1 1 mandat e more env i ronmenta 1 wo rK _ Michael Roush indicated they could but whether they would is unknown _ Ha ro 1 d McGU i rK recommended a representative £ rom E BRP b e on the C i t i z en s• C omm i tte e_ He a l s o f e l t it wou 1 d be r i s ky t o t eke property d i r e ct 1 y f rom Haywa rd-_ The re wa s th en d i s cu s s i on regarding h ow th e p top erty taxe s wou 1 d b e apportioned _ Mayo r Merce r i nd i ca t eel the to x sp 1 i t i s 7 5 $/ 2 5$_ Ha a l s o i nd i s at eel s erv i c e s were an i s sue even i£ the p top e rty wa s a park _ Mayor Mercer as}ced for a Stoering Committee to be formed to guide the C i t i z en s• Committee . 1 Counc i lm emb er , 1 P 1 ann i ng Commissioner ~ 3 property owners ~ 3 £ rom c it i z en s • group ~ 1 E a s t Bay Reg i one 1 Pa rlc D i st r i ct representative _ They to addre s s a s many i s sue s a s they want C ounc i 1 to d i rect t o b e s tud i eel by the b i gge r committee _ G ive sta f £ a n opportunity to 1 001 at what C i ty Counc i 1 and P1 a nn i ng C omm i s s i on p ropo s e and come b a ck to C ounc i t a long with F o oth i 1 1 C o rr i d o r po 1 i cy _ Page 5