My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:182
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:182
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2006 4:49:46 PM
Creation date
9/14/2006 4:55:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/3/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:182
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ponderosa Homes - Lehman/Selway Property - Environmental Checklist <br /> <br />less-than-significant level before construction continues. The applicant shall have the ar- <br />chaeologist produce a letter stating that they were on site during the initial construction <br />activities and the result of their observations at the site. <br /> <br />. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall present a contract or letter <br />indicating the archaeologist who will be on site during the initial construction activities. <br /> <br />Therefore, this would be a less-than-signijicant-impact. <br /> <br />6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS <br /> <br />Environmental Setting <br /> <br />The subject site lies within the Alquist-Priolo Fault Zones, Seismic Zone 8. The approval of a project by <br />a city or county must be in accordance with policies and criteria established by the State Mining and <br />Geology Board. Cities and counties shall require, prior to the approval of a project, a geologic report <br />defining and delineating any hazard of surface fault rupture. If the city or county finds that no undue <br />hazard of that kind exists, the geologic report on the hazard may be waived, with the approval of the <br />State Geologist. After a report has been approved or a waiver granted, subsequent geologic reports shall <br />not be required, provided that new geologic data warranting further investigations is not recorded. <br /> <br />Standards of Significance <br /> <br />For purposes of this environmental document, an impact is considered significant if the proposed project <br />would: <br /> <br />. Result in a project being built that will either introduce geologic, soils, or seismic hazard by allow- <br />ing the construction of the project on such a site without protection against those hazards. <br /> <br />Issues <br /> <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact <br /> <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />With Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br /> <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Impact <br /> <br />No <br />Impact <br /> <br />Geo102V and Soils <br />Would the project: <br /> <br />a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial ad- <br />verse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death <br />involving: <br /> <br />i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated <br />on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault <br />Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the <br />area or based on other substantial evidence of a <br />known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Ge- <br />ology Special Publication 42. <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />[R] <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />PUD-50 and PTR-5572 <br /> <br />Page 160f36 <br /> <br />June 7, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.