Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ponderosa Homes - Lehman/Selway Property - Environmental Checklist <br /> <br /> Less Than <br /> Potentially Significant Less Than <br /> Significant With Mitigation Significant No <br />Issues (Continued) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally pro- D D D [K] <br /> tected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean <br /> Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vemal <br /> pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hy- <br /> drological interruption, or other means? <br />d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any na- D D D [K] <br /> tive resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or <br /> with established native resident or migratory wildlife <br /> corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery <br /> sites? <br />e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protect- 0 0 [KJ 0 <br /> ing biological resources, such as a tree preservation <br /> policy or ordinance? <br />t) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat 0 0 0 [i] <br /> Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation <br /> Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat <br /> conservation plan? <br />Discussion <br /> <br />a-d) The subject property is fairly level, and dominated by native grasses vegetation, remnant walnut <br />trees of the former orchard, and domestic tree foupings near the existing houses. Based on the <br />site survey conducted by Live Oak Associates , there are no known endangered, threatened, or <br />rare species of flora or fauna known to inhabit the project site, nor is the site considered to be <br />habitat area for said species. Therefore, this would be a less-than-significant-impact. <br /> <br />e) Pursuant to the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a tree survey and analysis for this project site has <br />been prepared by HortScience, Inc. The report concluded three existing trees warranted saving. <br />As proposed and conditioned with the PUD approval, these trees will be preserved and incorpo- <br />rated in the rear yards of the proposed development. Therefore, this would be a less-than- <br />significant-impact. <br /> <br />t) There is no adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan or other <br />approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan and this is not applicable to this pro- <br />ject. Therefore, this would be no-impact. <br /> <br />PUD-50 and PTR-5572 <br /> <br />Page 14 of 36 <br /> <br />June 7, 2006 <br />