SR 06:182 - Laserfiche WebLink

requests - a direct street connection to Martin Avenue, for example - are reflected in the project for the reasons stated in the Planning Commission staff report. A complete discussion of the following: . Pleasanton General Plan Conformance (Density. Amenities, Livermore Municipal Airport Noise), . Traffic (Trip Generation. Traffic Analysis. and Mitigation Measures, Residential Street Analysis, Cameron Avenue Reconstruction, Cameron Avenue Sidewalk, Closing Cam- eron Avenue at the West Project Boundary), . Site Design (Street Alignment, Lot Sizes, Distribution of Building Models, Development Standards, Land Transfer to Palmer Drive Neighbors), . Building Design, . Green Building MeasuresIPhotovoltaic System Readiness, . Growth Management Allocations, . Grading, . Undergrounding Overhead Utilities, and . Urban Stormwater Runoff is in the attached Planning Commission staff report. Staff understands that there may be a request to apply a view easement controlling the height of landscaping including trees and shrubs to the proposed project so as to protect the views of the properties south of Cameron Avenue looking northerly across the Lehman-Selway property. The Bonde development, approved on May 21, 1991, is the most recent project to include a view easement, protecting the views from Abbie Drive properties looking across Bernal Avenue towards Bonde Ridge. There have been no development applications since Bonde approved with a view easement. Staff notes that the proposed project is an infill development surrounded by existing developments without view easements. In staffs opinion, there are no significant nearby natural features that would warrant staffs recommendation for view easements. VI. PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN FINDINGS The Pleasanton Municipal Code sets forth the purposes ofthe Planned Unit Development (PUD) District and the considerations to be addressed in reviewing a PUD development plan proposal. The City Council must make findings one through seven stated in the attached Planning Com- mission staff report that the proposed PUD development plan conforms to the purposes of the PUD District, before taking action. VII. PUBLIC COMMENT Public notices were sent to property owners living in an area generally defined by a portion of Stoneridge Drive, Martin Avenue, Mohr Avenue, Katie Lane, Rheem Drive, and Oakland Ave- nue. Attached are the letters and emails - in support and in opposition - received by staff during SR 06:182 Page 11 of14