My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:221
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:221
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2006 4:57:20 PM
Creation date
9/14/2006 4:44:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/19/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:221
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />contained in the Downtown Specific Plan and Downtown Pleasanton Design Guidelines. Some <br />of the Specific Plan Policies and Design Guidelines applicable to residential additions include: <br /> <br />Downtown Specific Plan Policies <br /> <br />. Design and Beautification Policy No. 14 - Preserve and protect the character of the East <br />Side neighborhood around Second Street from tear-downs, large-scaled and <br />inappropriately-styled additions, and lot consolidations. Preserve and encourage similar <br />architectural elements and details such as porches, picket fences, and flower boxes. <br />Preserve the neighborhood's orientation of street-facing entrances and windows. <br /> <br />. Design and Beautification Policy No. 17 - Protect the established size and spacing of <br />buildings in residential neighborhoods by avoiding excessive lot coverage and maintaining <br />appropriate separations between buildings. <br /> <br />. Design and Beautification Policy No. 19 - Maintain the original character of homes by <br />encouraging additions at the rear of the site, wherever possible. <br /> <br />Downtown Design Guidelines <br /> <br />. Reduce mass through roofforms such as hips, dormers, small gables, and articulations such <br />as balconies. <br /> <br />. Integrate additions into the existing massing of the house to avoid a "tacked-on" <br />appearance. <br /> <br />. New construction, additions and remodels should reflect the architectural style and detailing <br />of the surrounding neighborhood. <br /> <br />The design of the proposed additions would match the architectural style and detailing of the <br />existing home and would be aesthetically compatible with the other homes in this historic <br />Downtown neighborhood. The proposed project would meet the floor area ratio (FAR) and <br />height regulations of the R-I-6,500 Zoning District, which are designed to control the overall <br />mass and height of structures on a property. The height of the addition is not out of scale with <br />several of the other structures along Second Street, and the new roof on the rear of the existing <br />home and above the proposed additions matches the steep (8: 12) roof pitch on the front of the <br />existing home in order to create a seamless transition to the proposed additions. Although a <br />lower roof height could be achieved through a more moderate roof pitch, staff believes the <br />resulting home would be less aestheticalIy pleasing. The remodel would also improve the rear <br />elevation of the home by changing the flat roofline of the existing rear elevation - the result of a <br />previous addition. The smalI front porch would be enlarged to create an attractive entry feature <br />on the front elevation of the house. Except for the smalI, approximately 26 sq. ft. one-story <br /> <br />SR:06:221 <br />Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.