My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:221
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:221
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2006 4:57:20 PM
Creation date
9/14/2006 4:44:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/19/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:221
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />noticing the application, staff determined that the proposed separation setback is approximately <br />11 Y2 feet. <br /> <br />The proposed two-story addition at Mr. Boyce's property at 4546 Second Street would be <br />located 3.85 feet from the southern side property line, matching the existing side yard setback of <br />his home, instead ofthe 5-foot minimum side yard setback required by Code. Mr. Boyce's <br />application includes a request for a side yard setback variance. If Mr. Boyce's proposed <br />addition was located a minimum of 5 feet from the side property line, then the applicants' <br />proposed one-story addition would be separated approximately 12.65 feet from Mr. Boyce's <br />proposed addition. While the applicants' proposed addition would still require a separation <br />variance even if Mr. Boyce's proposed addition were set back 5 feet from the side property line, <br />staff believes that some flexibility to the separation requirement should be considered for the <br />applicants given the neighbor's request to allow his second-story addition to follow the existing <br />non-conforming side yard setback. <br /> <br />Except for the separation requirement for the northern side addition, the proposed additions <br />comply with all of the other site development standards of the R-I-6,500 Zoning District (e.g., <br />setbacks, height, floor area ratio, etc.). <br /> <br />VARIANCE FINDINGS <br /> <br />Any variance must be reviewed in light of the three specific findings required by state law. The <br />variance is granted not by degree, but based only upon specific facts and site conditions which <br />support the findings. The applicant must demonstrate: <br /> <br />1. That because of special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, <br />shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application ofthe provisions <br />ofthis chapter deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in <br />the vicinity and under identical zoning classification; <br /> <br />The R-1-6,500 Zoning District requires a minimum lot width of 65 feet, minimum lot <br />depth of 100 feet, and a minimum area of 6,500 square feet. At approximately 79 feet in <br />width, 150 feet in depth, and 11,888 square feet in area, the lot exceeds the minimum <br />required lot width, depth, and area for the R-1-6,500 District. However, the subject <br />property is unique in that it is moderately sloped and contains a pool immediately behind <br />the existing house. These factors make compliance with the separation requirements <br />more difficult on the subject lot than on flat lots without pools located immediately <br />adjacent to the rear of the home. Therefore, staff feels there are circumstances unique to <br />this property, and that the first finding can be made for the variance. <br /> <br />Case No. PV-153/PADR-1536 <br /> <br />Zoning Administrator <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.