SR 06:210 - Laserfiche WebLink

8. Integration of signs as part of the architectural concept; and No signage is being proposed with this project. 9. Architectural concept of miscellaneous structures, street furniture, public art in rela- tionship to the site and landscape. (Ord. 1612 * 2,1993; Ord. 1591 * 2,1993) No miscellaneous structures, street furniture, public art is being proposed with this pro- ject. PUBLIC NOTICE Staff sent notices of the Planning Commission's public hearing on this item to all prop- erty owners and residents located within 1,000-feet of the subject property on July 13, 2006, At the writing of this staff report, staff has received no public comment. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Projects of this nature are categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15301(e)(2), Therefore, no environmental document accompanies this report, CONCLUSION Staff believes that the proposed project is well designed, aesthetically pleasing, and will blend in well with the neighborhood that has a mix of architectural styles and heights. Additionally, the project conforms with all site standards of the R-I-7500 zoning district. Staff believes that the concerns raised by the Stantons have been adequately addressed by the conditions of approval attached in Exhibit B, Staff therefore believes the Zoning Ad- ministrator approval should be upheld, STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions: 1. Deny the appeal (P AP-97); and 2, Uphold the Zoning Administrator's approval of Case No. PADR-1542 subject to the conditions of approval listed in Exhibit B, StafJPlanner: Leslie Mendez, (925) 931-5611, lmendez@cipleasantonca,us Item 6.d, PAP-97/PADR-1542 Page 9 of9 July 26, 2006