My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:210
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:210
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2007 11:06:55 AM
Creation date
9/1/2006 2:03:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/5/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:210
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />lants, it should be noted that even if the Rhoades' lot is 7,526 square feet as per County <br />record as opposed to the 7560 square feet on record with the City, the applicant's project <br />would be at a 40.18% floor area ratio (FAR), that staff, by practice, would round down to <br />40%. The project would therefore still be in conformity with the site development stan- <br />dards for the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Upon seeing the project plans, Mrs. Stanton commented that the home's design was very <br />attractive. However, the Stantons express concern that the design is not in keeping with <br />the tract's character of original and remodeled homes. On the site visits staff made to the <br />tract, staff noted that contrary to the appellants' statement, the tract houses a variety of <br />tasteful styles and remodels, including one and two story homes. Please see the below <br />photos that show a selection of homes on Anastacia Court and Joanne Circle, More ex- <br />amples of homes in the tract are shown in Exhibit G. Although the Stantons state that <br />their sunlight, clear open sky and open space will be severely restricted by a 2-story <br />building, it must be noted that the site development standards for the tract allow homes <br />up to 30 feet in height. The neighborhood currently enjoys a mix of I-story and 2-story <br />homes; some of the latter which back up to single story homes. Please see Exhibit H for a <br />survey of single-story and 2-story homes in the vicinity. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />The appellants have also raised concern in how the City measures the turret at 30 feet in <br />height when its highest point is 36 feet. This point on behalf of the appellants is incorrect <br />in that the plans depict the maximum height of the turret to be approximately 31.5 feet, <br />not 36 feet as the Stantons state in their appeal letter, As staff has previously explained to <br />Mr, Stanton at the planning counter, and as reviewed in the ZA hearing, the Code clearly <br />states that, "The height of a structure shall be measured vertically from the average eleva- <br />tion of the natural grade of the ground covered by the structure to the [..,] mean height <br />between eaves and ridges for a hip, gable, or gambrel roof," (p,M,C. ~18,84.140), There- <br />fore, per Code, the height of the turret measures approximately 28 feet, or two feet under <br />the height limit. Staff also notes that the turret is located at the front of the Rhoades' <br /> <br />Item 6.d, PAP-97/PADR-I542 <br /> <br />Page 60f9 <br /> <br />July 26, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.