PC 2006-08 - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. PC-2006-08 Yage Two 3. The subdivision, together with its design and improvement, is consistc~~t with the General Plan. The PUll was found to be consistent with the ~lcneral Plan, and. this subdivision is consistent with the developnZCnt pl aii. As proposed, the subdivision is coiripati ble with the objectives, policies, land uses, acid programs specified itt the C3cneral Plait. Therefore, this finding can be made. 4. The subdivision site is physically suitable fbr the type and density of dcvelopn~wzt. "f'Yhe site is relatively it at and has an existing residence on it. "hhe ]ot is an in$11 lot close to the Downtown area. 'Th ercf~>re, this finding can be made. 5. The design of the subdivision aa~d iinproven~ents arc not lilccly to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably it~jure fish or wildlife in their habitat. The design of the subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably in"jure fish or wildlife, in their habitat, as evidence by the adopti oi~ by the City Council oii January l 7, 2006 of the Negative Declaration and finding a cz'c: minimu.r impact to li.sh and wildlife. Therefore, this finding can be made. 6. The design of the subdivision or type o1-in~proven~ents is not lilccly to cause serious public health problems. The subdivision is designed to be served by all City utilities and services at established service levels. Full water and sewer service is includcd_ No earthqualce, flooding, or other natural hazards exist at this site at a level dean-icd "unacceptable" in the General Plan. Therefore, this finding can be made. 7. "11ie design of the subdivision or the type of improvements does not conflict with easen~cnts for access through or use of the property. The applicant will be required to abandon an existing access eascn-ient for the benefit of the Jones faintly parcel. Anew access casement shall be established between Lots 8 and 9 located at Street A to the Jonas parcel. The abandonment is required prior to final map recordation. Therefore, this finding ca» be made. 8. The restriction on approving a tentative subdivision map on land covered by a contract entered into pursua»t to the California Land Conservation l~ct of 1965 is not applicabic. The site is not covered by such a contract There fore_ this finding can be rn ade.