My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 91013
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
RES 91013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/3/2012 3:47:44 PM
Creation date
7/27/1999 8:30:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/22/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
cultivable lands. However, a provision is included in the Plan <br /> which appears to waive the $30,000 per unit fee if 'land is <br /> preserved, acre for acre, in another part of the Study Area. <br /> Cultivable land within the Gateway, however, is only subject to <br /> the $10,000 per unit fee. <br /> <br /> The fee approach is a simpler method than TDRs of compensating <br /> owners of cultivable land who do not wish to develop by those who <br /> own land and wish to develop. Staff believes that fees are a more <br /> realistic and administratively simpler method of achieving the <br /> same objective. <br /> <br />Agricultural Land Trust <br /> <br />The objectives of the Land Trust are to purchase conservation <br />easements, facilitate the planting of vineyards and the <br />development of wineries, and promote the South Livermore Valley <br />as a wine producing destination. Staff believes that all three <br />objectives are necessary in order for the Valley to be a <br />successful wine region and tourist destination. Staff believes <br />that agricultural land should remain in private ownership and <br />that the Trust should only purchase land in two types of <br />situations. The first situation would involve an agricultural <br />parcel which, if developed, would jeopardize the contiguity of <br />adjacent vineyards. In this case, the Trust might purchase a <br />conservation easement equal in value to the development rights of <br />the property. These rights generally are estimated to be about <br />80% to 90% of the total value of the land. The land, then, would <br />remain in private ownership with an easement prohibiting <br />development, and thereby preserving the potential for <br />agriculture. <br /> <br />It should be noted, however, that a conservation easement, in and <br />of itself, does not guarantee the use of the land for viticulture <br />or any other agricultural use. The Trust may wish to also provide <br />additional incentives to encourage the owner to plant grapes. <br />These incentives might include low interest loans for <br />agricultural improvements, reduced infrastructure costs, or <br />assistance in gaining Williamson Act contracts to reduce taxes. <br />The second situation would involve a parcel of land that was <br />about to be sold to a developer. The Trust may wish to purchase <br />the property outright, retain the development rights, and then <br />sell the property to a grape grower. This situation should only <br />be used in emergencies, as the costs of maintaining and <br />administering publicly held land should be minimized. <br /> <br />The third use of the Trust Fund would be to promote the South <br />Livermore Valley as a premier wine grape growing region and <br />tourist destination, similar to the Napa or Sonoma Valleys but on <br />a smaller scale. The key to marketing any product, such as wine, <br /> <br />SR:91:30 <br /> <br /> -10- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.