Laserfiche WebLink
Table 1. Evaluation of Alternatives (continued) <br /> <br /> Program type <br /> <br /> Collection <br /> <br /> Cri|eria Periodic Permanent--County program I Mobile I Public or private curbside <br />Institutional barriers The local fire department needs to be informed and involved in a periodic collection event. A permit may be needed from <br /> the local fire department for these types of collection programs. Permits from state and federal authorities may also be <br /> needed for both types of programs. The "NIMBY" syndrome can be barriers to locate a site to implement these progrmns. <br /> <br />Estimated costs Based on the cost of the one day For $2.4 million, the County The cost of ongoing Curbside collection would <br /> event held by the City of Fremo- believes that they can build a mobile collection is be priced to be self-sup- <br /> nt, the County has estimated that permanent facility that could he expected to be prohibi- potting, including private <br /> a one day county-wide event open 200 days a year and be tively high. fee-for-service or public <br /> would cost approximately $1 available to the entire County. HHW collection sur- <br /> million. CosIs to Pleasanton Costs to Pleasanton would be charge. <br /> would be approximately $53,000. approximately $132,000. <br /> <br />Availability of end uses Some types of HHW have potenlial market end uses. Latex paint and used motor oil can be recycled and reused. Other <br /> wastes are usually incinerated. Unlike nonhazardous wastes, the issue for HHW is not so much extending the value of the <br /> product, but to prevent contamination that might pollute the environment. <br /> <br /> 57 15~REPORTS',DUBLIN'xHIIW.T- 1 <br /> <br /> <br />