RES 92016 - Laserfiche WebLink

Table 1. Evaluation of Alternatives Program iype Collection Criteria Periodic Pennanent--County program Mobile Public or private curbside Hazards crealion For periodic programs, staff need Permanent facilities tend to Ongoing mobile sites Regular curbside collee- to be trained for each collection have fewer hazards because the would use permanent tion would reduce the event on how to handle the dif- structures ate designed to seg- staff. hazard to residents of stor- ferent substances. regate wastes, and permanent ing and transporting ttHW staff are accustomed to han- in the home. dling the wide variety of wastes that arrive at such a facility. Abili ly to accommodate Each of these collection facilities can be adapted to accommodate changing economic, technological, and social conditions. change Implementation schedule Can be implemented in the short tenn. Each requires training, acquiring appropriate storage containers, and developing a plan to recycle, store, or dispose of the wastes. Need to expand/build A periodic HHW collection Permanent collection sites will Ongoing mobile collection and regular curbside col- progr, un does not require facili- require facility conslxuction. !ection would require some facilities and equipment. ties, although sonre equipment is Existing facilities can be modi- necessary. fled to add necessary fire con- trol devices and to accommo- date the potential for spillage, or, new facilities can be built. Consislency wilh local There are no local ordinances, plans, or policies that prohibit any collection alternative. In the There have been some conditions development of the County plan, the city, as member agency, agreed to develop local policies discussions with PGS and ordinances that are consistent with the safe disposal of HHW and acknowledge its regarding regular curbside obligation to share the responsibilities. collection of waste oil. Plans are still in the con- ceptual stage. 5 7 15NRliPORT~XI)UB LINNI n IW.I' - i