My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 99089
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
RES 99089
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2012 1:59:09 PM
Creation date
7/9/1999 5:39:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/22/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Included in Section 2 of the Appendix are three tables which project development for the purpose of <br />identifying potential development related revenues. The first table identifies those particulaz <br />developments which have all development approvals and aze included as revenue in this CIP. The <br />second table includes those projects which have development approval but do not have Growth <br />Management approval. These projects are not included in the CIP. Should these projects receive <br />Growth Management approvals and proceed with development, their fee-related revenue would be <br />collected and recorded in the appropriate yeaz. The potential revenues from these projects over the five <br />yeaz CIP is $1,115,018. Finally, the third table represents those projects which have been submitted for <br />review or aze expected to be submitted for approval during this CIP period. These projects are not <br />included in this CIP. Again, should these projects be approved, the revenue which could reach <br />$18,596,054 generated from them would be added to the CIP and made available for projects in future <br />years. <br />While staff could have made some assumption regazding approvals of projects without all necessary <br />approvals, the recommendation to only include those projects which have all necessary approvals is <br />appropriate considering the number of uncertainties related to future development issues. Should <br />additional projects begin development, revenue adjustments will be made as part of the Mid-Term <br />Budget. In addition, while the revenue projections aze based substantially on approved projects, they <br />must be viewed as tentative since even these projects may be effected by the economy and the health of <br />the housing and construction industry which is generally beyond the City's control. <br />In addition to issues related to forecasting revenue generated from the new City development fees, <br />consistent with the City's Development Impact Fee Report, the public facility development fees <br />collected must be used on specific projects identified in the Development Impact Fee Report. Included <br />in Section 4 of the Appendix, is a listing of the status of those projects in this CIP. Also, the unfunded <br />project list includes information which identifies which projects aze eligible to receive revenue from <br />public facility development fees. Staff will continue to track these projects in future CIP's to assure that <br />revenue from the development fees is appropriately allocated to eligible projects. In addition, staff <br />anticipates a regular review of those projects in the Development Fee Impact Report to assure that they <br />are consistent with projected development impacts and the amount of fees required to mitigate those <br />impacts. <br />Developer Contributions <br />In addition to revenue received through development fees, the CIP includes $1,556,955 from <br />development contributions. Development contributions represents those revenues received from <br />xi <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.