My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:159
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:159
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2006 2:59:57 PM
Creation date
6/16/2006 3:16:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/20/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:159 (1)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 1 of2 <br /> <br />Marion Pavan <br /> <br />From: rlloyd485@aol.com <br />Sent: Monday, March 20, 20064:29 PM <br />To: Marion Pavan <br />Subject: Re: Hatsushi Estates <br /> <br />Marion, <br /> <br />:orrect. The impasse is that they wanted me to support the use of the EVA for construction purposes. Since I <br />vould not do that, they withdrew any discussion about land transfer. We actually agreed on a price for the land, <br />md I was willing to pay it - the fallout is simply over the EVA. <br /> <br />\that does not appear to have been considered, and is very appealing to me - is to make that upper area a <br />;eparate cui de sac with the road running directly behind my property. That would put more separation between <br />lur home and whatever home is behind us, but would turn the EVA into a cui de sac. I actually WOULD support <br />hat because of the separation. When I told that to Mori Hatsushi, he thought that the current development <br />.Ians were too far down the road to consider it. <br />However, since this idea was never discussed with me or the neighborhood, I would very much like that put <br />In the table. It would preserve the number of sites the Hatsushi's want, and create better view lots for those <br />lomes because their back yards would be directly above the dropoff into the rest of the Hatsushi property. <br />Why has that not been considered before now, and how do we get that option to have a fair "hearing"? <br /> <br />legards, <br />ml <br /> <br />----Original Message----- <br />'rom: Marion Pavan <MPavan@ci.pleasanton.ca.us> <br />'0: RLloyd485@aol.com <br />ient: Mon, 20 Mar 200611:58:10 -0800 <br />iubject: RE: Hatsushi Estates <br /> <br />~on: <br /> <br />lccording to the Hatsushis, it appears that they were unable to reach an agreement on the land transfer. Hence, <br />he Hatsushis wish to proceed with the proposed development plan without any changes including the use of the <br />VA for construction and domestic traffic until Clara Lane is extended to the Hatsushi property. <br /> <br />1arion <br /> <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: RLloyd485@aol.com [mailto:RLloyd485@aol.com] <br />Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 8:04 PM <br />To: Marion Pavan <br />Subject: Hatsushi Estates <br /> <br />Marion, <br /> <br />Are there any upcoming meetings on the Hatsushi Estates proposal by either the Planning Commission, or the Council? <br />In a letter I recently received from Ralph Hughes, he references a meeting on March 29 at which he expects this to be <br />discussed. <br /> <br />I haven't received notifications for any meetings, so I just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing an opportunity to represent <br />our interests. <br /> <br />Also, at the January Planning Commission meeting, the commissioners asked staff if they were working with me on the <br />resolution for the "triangle" (where the EVA is supposed to go through). The staff members replied "yes", but no one has <br /> <br />/2112006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.