Laserfiche WebLink
<br />being followed with the Mariposa Ranch homes by the Callippe Golf Course. With the notifica- <br />tion of the Zoning Administrator's action sent to the Planning Commission, staff will provide <br />the approval letter, conditions of approval, and the plan set including colored building perspec- <br />tives and building elevations. For the Mariposa Ranch homes, the appeal period of the Zoning <br />Administrator's action is 20 days from the date of approval. <br /> <br />The applicants are willing to work with staff to further refine the guidelines following the above <br />discussion and have committed to working with staff to achieve this goal. Staff, however, be- <br />lieves the applicants should retain the services of a design professional to accomplish this pur- <br />pose. Therefore, staff recommends the Planning Commission defer its action on the guidelines <br />to the public hearing on the tentative subdivision map, and suggests the Planning Commission <br />provide any further suggestions on the scope of the guidelines. The staff recommendation is re- <br />flected as a draft condition of approval. <br /> <br />Development Standards <br /> <br />The Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan states: <br /> <br />"The site development standards..." - referring to Table IV-2, "Residential De- <br />velopment Standards, from the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan - "...(lot <br />size and dimensions, building setbacks, building height, and accessory structures) <br />shall be applied through the City's PUD development plan approval process and <br />may vary for unusual site conditions as long as any new standards are consistent <br />with the intent of the Specific Plan." <br /> <br />Staff has reviewed the proposed development standards stated in the guidelines and recommends <br />the following changes to the proposed guidelines: <br /> <br />. R-I-20,000 Development Standards (Guidelines Page 3 of 16): <br />R-I-20,000 Development Standards are proposed for these lots. Staff recommends <br />using the standards of Table IV-2 with a IS-foot street side setback for corner lots, re- <br />flecting the IS-foot interior setback, instead of the 20-foot setback of the Specific <br />Plan. <br /> <br />. Grading (Guidelines Page 4 of 16): <br />A maximum 2: 1 slope ratio is proposed for cut slopes and a 3: 1 slope ratio for fill lots. <br />Staff recommends a maximum 3: 1 slope ratio for both cut and fill slopes. <br /> <br />. Garages (Guidelines Page 4 of 16): <br />A minimum three-car garage requirement is proposed. Staff recommends a minimum <br />two-care garage and three on-site guest parking spaces for each lot. Driveway aprons <br />may provide the guest parking spaces. <br /> <br />Item 6.b., PUD-99-/4 <br /> <br />Page /4 of24 <br /> <br />April 26, 2006 <br />