My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:143
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:143
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/3/2007 2:51:01 PM
Creation date
6/2/2006 12:21:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/6/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:143
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />district would be subject to the requirements of Proposition 218, and the increased assessments <br />would be required to have approval of a majority vote. <br /> <br />Existing assessment districts must also comply with Proposition 218's requirement that only <br />special benefits, not general benefits, may be assessed when evaluating lighting and landscape <br />maintenance districts. The definition of a special benefit is "a particular and distinct benefit <br />over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the <br />public at large." General enhancement of property value does not constitute "special benefit." <br />To the extent an assessment provides both general benefits and special benefits, the City must <br />separate the general benefits from the special benefits and pay for the general benefits out of <br />another revenue source, typically the City's General Fund. <br /> <br />With these adjustments for Proposition 218, staff believes that the existing Landscape and <br />Lighting Districts should continue. The landscaping being maintained under each district is of <br />specific benefit to the property owners comprising each district, and the Lighting and <br />Landscaping Assessment process provides the most efficient and effective means for <br />maintenance to be assured. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />The City currently has five Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts which are being <br />assessed. <br /> <br />When the properties within the Districts are assessed, the fee is included on the County <br />property tax bill. At that time, the County adds 1.7% to the base assessment as an <br />administration fee. The assessments on the City parcels located within Ponderosa-Del Prado, <br />Bonde Ranch and Moller Ranch districts will not include the 1.7% County administration fee <br />as the Finance Department will transfer the money from the General Fund into the specific <br />district fund without involving the County. <br /> <br />The Engineer's budget for each district includes a reserve fund to provide for the replacement <br />of assets such as decorative entry walls, signage, light fixtures, etc. Replacement costs have <br />been calculated for the eventual replacement of the assets of each district. <br /> <br />Landscape and Lighting District 1984-1, Ponderosa Homes-Del Prado <br /> <br />The Ponderosa Homes subdivision (L & L District 1984-1) has been in place for twenty-two <br />(22) years. Maintenance in this District includes the care of masonry walls, trees, shrubbery, <br />groundcover and irrigation systems along Paseo Santa Cruz between Corte Santa Maria and <br />Corte Pacifica. <br /> <br />SR 06:143 <br />Page 4 of7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.