My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:143
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:143
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/3/2007 2:51:01 PM
Creation date
6/2/2006 12:21:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/6/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:143
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />9. Coordinate with the City Finance Department to send the annual assessment information <br />to the County for inclusion on the property tax bill (Alameda County must receive annual <br />assessment totals prior to August 1 each year). <br /> <br />10. Transfer City administration costs from the Assessment District Account to the City's <br />General Fund. <br /> <br />Effects of Proposition 218 <br /> <br />Proposition 218, commonly referred to as the "Fox Initiative" or "Right to Vote on Taxes <br />Act," was passed by the voters on November 5, 1996. The Proposition amends the State's <br />Constitution by adding Articles XIII(C) and XIII(D) to do the following: <br /> <br />Limit the authority of local governments (including cities, counties, special districts, <br />school districts, and redevelopment agencies) to impose taxes and property related <br />assessments, fees, and charges. <br /> <br />Establish procedures for implementing annual assessments which includes benefit <br />assessments, special assessments, and maintenance assessments, etc. The procedures <br />include a requirement that the City develop an engineering report which identifies the <br />benefit that will accrue to each individual property as a result of the assessment. <br />Further, subject to certain exceptions, it establishes that the majority of the property <br />owners in the assessment district must vote in favor of the assessment for it to be <br />implemented each year. Fees or charges for sewer, water, and refuse collection <br />services are exempted from the Proposition. Further, general tax assessments for <br />police, fire, and emergency medical programs are prohibited. <br /> <br />If the District was formed prior to Proposition 218 and pursuant to a petition signed by the <br />property owner(s) of all the parcels subject to the assessment, the District is exempt from the <br />requirement that a majority of the property owners must vote each year in favor of the <br />assessment. All the existing Lighting and Landscape Assessment Districts were formed <br />pursuant to such a petition. Accordingly, as none of the assessments are proposed to be <br />higher than originally imposed, no vote is required of the current property owners. <br /> <br />Four of the existing districts, (Bonde Ranch, Windsor, Oak Tree Farm and Moller Ranch), <br />have a cost-of-living increase provision which allows for an annual increase in the assessment. <br />If there is an increase in the annual assessment within this cost escalator, the district is subject <br />to the notice requirements stated in Street and Highways Code ~22626 when the assessment is <br />increased from the previous year. This code states that the City is required to send notices to <br />each property owner whenever there is an increase from the previous year's assessment. <br />However, if the annual assessment should ever be increased in excess of the cost escalator, the <br /> <br />SR 06:143 <br />Page 3 of7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.