Laserfiche WebLink
DESCRIPTION OF TFIE APPROVED PROJECT <br /> <br />The Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan is intended to serve as the primary land use and regulatory <br />guide for development of the 384-acre Plan Area. The objective of the Specific Plan is to establish a <br />high-quality living environment that features a rural/vineyard character and provides for a variety of <br />residential, commercial, vineyard, open space, recreational, elementary school, and other uses. The <br />Specific Plan includes development of 189 single-family residential units, a 12-acre elementary school, a <br />20-acre community park, and 67 acres of vineyards. In addition, Lot 28 within the Specific Plan area <br />would have the option to develop a 100-room inn/spa/restaurant/conference facility and vineyard estate <br />instead of housing, and small bed-and-breakfast inns would be conditionally allowed on certain lots. <br />Changes in the roadway network would include the realignment of Vineyard Avenue which would be <br />moved toward the northern property boundary adjacent to Arroyo del Valle. Public services, including <br />water and wastewater facilities, would be extended to the site to accommodate the proposed <br />development. <br /> <br />The land use plan is intended to facilitate the transition between the urbanized edge of Pleasanton to the <br />west and the more rural, larger lot Ruby Hill development to the east. The design concept requires <br />environmentally sensitive design of homes in the hillside areas south of Vineyard Avenue, and the <br />integration of vineyards and other land uses north of Vineyard Avenue, organized to create a functional <br />and attractive visual entry to the Livermore Valley wine country. <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br />In accordance with § 15126.6 of the State CEQA Guidelines, a range of reasonable alternatives to the <br />project that could feasiblely attain the basic project objectives were addressed in the EIR. An evaluation <br />of the No Project Altemative, in accordance with § 15126.6(e) of the CEQA Guidelines was also included <br />in the EIR. The alternatives considered in the EIR, the No Project Alternative, the 150-Unit <br />Development Alternative, the 250-Unit Development Alternative, the Vineyard Avenue Alignment <br />Alternative, the 480-unit alternative (evaluated in the Responses to Comments), and an Alternative <br />Locations Alternative are summarized below: <br /> <br />NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE <br /> <br />The No Project Alternative would maintain conditions as they currently exist. None of the <br />residential units identified in the Specific Plan would be developed. No commercial businesses, <br />parks or school facilities would be built and the proposed vineyard areas would not be established. <br />Vineyard Avenue would remain at its current location. Under the no project alternative, it is <br />assumed that the project site would develop in a manner consistent with its current zoning. A total <br />of 19 dwelling units are currently located on the site. Under current zoning, this could increase to <br />approximately 106 units. <br /> <br />The no project alternative would be the environmentally superior alternative based on the <br />minimization of environmental changes. Project objectives, however, would not be met with this <br />alternative. <br /> <br />150-UNIT DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE <br /> <br />This alternative assumes development of 150 new residential units. Lots west of the landfill (Lots 1-13) <br />would be developed with housing at a density of one- to two homes per developable acre, while <br />development on the remaining hillside lots south of Vineyard Avenue (Lots 15-! 7, 22-27, and 29-31) <br /> <br />Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan Draft EIR -2- Findings <br /> <br /> <br />