Laserfiche WebLink
<br />variation of it to set a long-term conservative goal but still provide some shorter-term <br />flexibility to meet unusual circumstances. For example, Program 12.3 might be amended <br />to say: "Establish a debt ratio goal for debt guaranteed by the General Fund of5% or less, <br />but limit the debt ratio to not more than ten percent, except as otherwise approved by a <br />unanimous ?? or 4/5 vote??? of the City Council." <br /> <br />The Economic Vitality Committee recommends that the City prepare policy guidance for <br />what the City would do if it hit the floor in its bond rating. <br /> <br />3. City Retirement Plan <br /> <br />This issue is similar on the surface to the above debt limit issue in that it tries limiting a <br />particular expense to a fixed percent of the budget. However, the two are different in a <br />couple of ways. First, there is a benchmark for what the debt ratio should be, as <br />determined at least by bond ratings, but there is no similar benchmark for retirement <br />costs. Second, the debt ratio relates to capital costs whereas the retirement costs are part <br />of the Operating Budget. <br /> <br />Personnel costs represent the largest percentage of the Operating Budget (45%). Since <br />the City is primarily a service providing entity. Like the private sector, personnel costs <br />include a number of things not limited to: wages, overtime, leave time, retirement <br />benefits, workers compensation, disability and health benefits. <br /> <br />Most public agencies in California participate in PERS (the Public Employees Retirement <br />System). Others contribute to a private pension plan or have both. Still others participate <br />in Social Security as well as PERS or a pension plan. The City of Pleasant on provides <br />only PERS to its employees, and has three distinct groups: Police, Fire and <br />Miscellaneous Employees (non-safety managers). Police and Fire employees are part of <br />unionized groups. The non-management Miscellaneous employees are represented by an <br />association, and the managers are not represented. <br /> <br />Employee compensation for all non-managers is determined as part oflabor negotiations <br />which usually result in multi-year contracts. Multi-year contracts are desirable as they <br />lend stability to the organization, provide labor peace, and make the budget more <br />manageable. Factors that the City considers when negotiating compensation include the <br />labor pool, market and compensation levels for similar positions in comparable nearby <br />cities, as well as internal equities. Wages and benefits are negotiated as part of the one <br />package. <br /> <br />Much attention has been given to increased PERS benefits and high rates in the last few <br />years, especially in the news media. What is not understood is that the rising costs have <br />been due primarily to poor performance in the PERS portfolio. If PERS meets all of its <br />actuarial assumptions including its 8.25% earning rate, then public agencies pay the <br /> <br />34 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />