My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:142
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:142
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2006 11:33:17 AM
Creation date
5/12/2006 10:39:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
DOCUMENT DATE
5/16/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:142
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />DRAFT <br /> <br />Summary of Snecific Plan "Straw Vote" Actions <br /> <br />Tennis Courts <br /> <br />Commissioner Mass supported including tennis courts, which have become extremely popular. <br />She would like to see a phased installation oflights, which would otherwise be harder to install <br />later. She believed that even unlit tennis courts would be a great amenity. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fox would not include tennis courts and believed there were enough public and <br />private tennis facilities in town. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce supported tennis courts and did not believe that an acre for six courts was <br />unreasonable, given the amount of organized sports in the City. She believed that unlit tennis <br />courts would be better than no courts at all. <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts agreed with Commissioner Pearce and added that it was a good sport for <br />adults. <br /> <br />Chairperson Arkin believed that phasing was a financial issue and supported tennis courts. <br /> <br />The straw vote was 4-1 infavor of adding tennis courts. <br /> <br />Swimming Pool <br /> <br />Chairperson Arkin noted that his son was on the Youth Commission and his wife was on the <br />Board of Directors for the YMCA. He would like to see a pool inside one of the buildings but <br />not a separate City aquatic center. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fox noted that the Amador Park was very crowded and that the Aquatic Center <br />was in a tight location. She had heard complaints about the Center being closed to public <br />swimming in the evenings due to swim team practices or lessons. She supported an indoor pool <br />but not a full aquatic center. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mass noted that she was not sold on the location and believed people near Santa <br />Rita Road would not be able to use it. She supported open space in the Bernal Property rather <br />than a pool. <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts did not want to add an outdoor pool, but indicated that ifthe YMCA <br />wanted to add one, she would support that. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce agreed with Commissioner Roberts' concerns. <br /> <br />The straw vote was 3-2 in favor of adding an indoor swimming pool to the potential <br />Youth/Community Center facility. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> <br />April 26, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.