Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3. Capacity for C....ves <br /> <br />According to the Cemetery's manager, there are approximately 200 recorded vacant burial spaces <br />currently for sale. In addition, the manager states that approximately 1,000 additional single burials <br />could be accommodated on the site by developing the remaining undeveloped portions oflbe Cemelery. <br />Based on Ibe Cemetery management's maps with undeveloped land shown (approximately a half-acre), <br />~ estimates that ~pproximatel~ 800 more single burials might be accommodated on the Cc:merery <br />Site. Most ccmetenes are now usmg double vaults, which layer onc burial vault on top of anorher, to use <br />land more efficiently and to maximize revenues. Using double vaults. the capacity 4;)f the Cemetery <br />could be enhanced further, <br /> <br />The projected nwnber of deaths in Pleasanton is approximately 600 deaths a year ...nth thaI number <br />slightly inc:n:asing as Ibe population grows.IO Based on national and state statistics,. 60 percent of people <br />choose full body burials and 40 percent choose cremation. According to one cemetery expert that staff <br />consulted, of the 60 peTtcnt wbo choose full body burials, up to 65 percent would be buried in secular <br />(non.affiliated) cemeteries in Ibeir local area. This means that a cemetery in Pleasa:nton might have a <br />demand for up to 23S body burials per year. Based on the above estimates of undeveloped square <br />foo. and grave capacity as well as cutTenl burial trends, the Cemetery may fill cemetery needs for the <br />entin: City for three and a half years using single burials. Grave capacity could be further increased <br />using a combination of single and double vault burials. For example, 1,200 graves could be <br />accommodated if split equally between single and double vault burials.lbus serving Pleasanton's <br />cemetery needs for approximately 5 years. However, as staled before, staffhas been. unable to determine <br />the exact location and size oflbe potter's field containing Ibe County burials which may impact the <br />estimated figures given above. <br /> <br />Other ways the Cemetery's capacity could be enhanced include constructing a colUOlbar:ium for nicbe <br />spaces (St. Augustine's currently has one) and accommodating more cremation burials, which use less <br />space. In addition. the Memorial Gardens management indicates other Wlderused space within the <br />Cemetery could be developed. such a.~ walkWllYs. <br /> <br />4. Possible PhysicaJ LimitatioDS <br /> <br />(A) Slope <br /> <br />Most of the ideal cemetery space (i.e.. the flatter scctiOllS) in Memorial Gardens bas already bec:n. <br />developed for gravcs. The undeveloped portions have steeper slopes, particularly at the south end <br />(approximately 18% slope). Near the temporary offices it is very steep (approximately 36% slope). <br />According to cemetery experts that staff bas consulted, slope docsn't have a great impact on whether <br />graves can be developed. Steeper slopes do require more careful planning and may hinder access by <br />visitors when slopes are wet or if visitors are elderly, Steep slopes also may decrco..<c: the total number of <br />"raves that can be developed since burials must he done at level grade. <br />.. <br /> <br />· Stlff dh'ided the estimate of unde,.eJoped land (21.800 sq. fi.) b)'lJle size of a standard singk gmu:n.d bDrial (24 sq. ft). Staff <br />theD ,uQuiIM,;&J:;LIIO r"'~u ofdi..,. ~QtAJ to a~r.;.OWll (or h>>) 1JfJ;;lavc .,;.aptllCi'ty due to ,tcep:r sl?pca in rb.c undc"Wclopcd sccnoDS. <br />10 Mort2lity esh!ll.1lC calculated by multiplying I'tOjected Ple~lon P<'pulalioo (The 2002 GrD",llI M~g.ment Report) by <br />natiou:al mortality rille of .8S~. <br /> <br />Ple""",ton Memorial Gardens Cemetery Rcpon <br /> <br />Page7ofJ6 <br />