Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Revised Total Compensation Proposal- <br />March 21, 2006 <br />Page 13 of 16 <br /> <br />given a low priority. We conduct all of the data collection and analysis ourselves <br />to ensure validity of the data and quality control. This approach also ensures <br />that we compare job description to job description and not just job titles, <br />therefore ensuring true "matches" of at least 70%, which is the percentage we <br />use to determine whether to include a comparator classification or not. <br /> <br />Typically, we collect classification descriptions, MODs, organization charts and <br />other information via Website, in person, by telephone or by an on-sight interview. <br />With this prior knowledge and our experience in the public personnel field, our <br />professional staff makes preliminary "matches" and then schedules an appointment <br />by telephone, and sometimes in person, with a knowledgeable individual to answer <br />specific questions. We find that the information collected using these methods has <br />a very high validity rate. <br /> <br />I D. ANALYSIS AND PRELIMINARY DATA REVIEW <br /> <br />Data will be entered into spreadsheet format designed for ease of interpretation <br />and use. The information will be presented in a format that will identify the <br />comparator positions used for each classification comparison. Information will be <br />calculated based upon both average and median figures, allowing the agency to <br />make informed compensation decisions. Benefit data will be collected and <br />displayed in an easy-to-read format. You will receive three sets of spreadsheets <br />per classification, one with base pay, one with the benefits detail, and one with <br />total compensation statistical data. <br /> <br />I E. DRAFT SPREADSHEETS/ MEETING WITH PROJECT TEAM/REANAL YSIS <br /> <br />We distribute our draft spreadsheets to the City for their review. <br /> <br />After the agency's preliminary review, K&A will meet with the Project Team as <br />well as representatives from the various stakeholders (if appropriate) to clarify <br />data, to receive requests for reanalysis of certain comparators (through the <br />employee's supervisor) and to answer questions and address concerns. This <br />provides an opportunity for the project team and employees to review and question <br />any of our recommended benchmark comparator matches. <br /> <br />If questions arise, we conduct follow-up analysis to reconfirm our original analysis <br />and/or make corrections as appropriate. <br /> <br />IF. INTERNAL JOB ANALYSIS <br /> <br />Although internal job analysis is usually part of our studies, our experience is that <br />when using both public and private data, it is unreliable to try and determine <br />internal relationships since only a few of the classifications have both public and <br /> <br />KOFF & ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />