My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 93107
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
RES 93107
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2012 2:21:36 PM
Creation date
4/15/1999 10:00:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/17/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
funding applications. Therefore, staff has excluded this request from the recommended <br />budget. <br /> <br />STATE BUDGET IMPACT <br /> <br />The most recent estimate of the impact of the State's budget adoption on Pleasanton is <br />an additional property tax loss of $1 million annually (with a one-time transfer of State <br />transportation money which reduces this year's impact to $721,000). This is in addition <br />to the permanent loss of $1.2 million implemented in 1991-92. <br /> <br />The State budget included the continuation of the one-half cent sales tax from July <br />through December. Permanent continuation of this tax will be determined by the voters <br />in November. Regardless of the result, Alameda County is projected to receive 50% of <br />Pleasanton's distribution, which is reflected in the two scenarios outlined below. <br /> <br /> Scenario 1: Voters do not approve sales tax extension. Should this occur, <br /> the League of California Cities estimates that Pleasanton will receive <br /> $90,000, which would be a one-time revenue. <br /> <br /> Scenario 2: Voters approve continuation of the sales tax extension. The <br /> League of California Cities estimates that Pleasanton will receive $180,000, <br /> which would be an ongoing revenue. <br /> <br />Because of the uncertainties of the coming fiscal year, staff has proposed basically a <br />"status quo" expenditure plan providing basically the same level of services to the <br />community as in the past. Staff will continue to review position vacancies on a case-by- <br />case basis, explore revenue enhancements and cash management policies, and analyze the <br />service level document in more detail. During this fiscal year, staff will work with the <br />Council to establish workshops to discuss the City's future service levels. <br /> <br />Respectfully Submitted, <br /> <br />Susan Rossi Deborah Acosta <br />Finance Director City Manager <br /> <br />SR/cf/kh asm.ct2~ <br /> <br />SR 93:332 7 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.