My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:090A
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:090A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2006 1:53:08 PM
Creation date
3/16/2006 1:51:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/20/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:090A
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Proiected Enrollments from 2IJ05 to 2015 <br /> <br />PlRasanton Unified School District <br /> <br />Our principal findings within these existing housing categories are: <br /> <br />(1) Among SFD residences, there were enrollment losses in most price ranges in recent years, with <br />an aggregate impact of a reduction by 145 students since 2000. Only the detached homes that <br />generally were built in the 1990s ("modern") provided an increase. The percentage in the <br />elementary grades is significantly lower In all five categories. This declining trend is occurring in <br />the majority of the district's neighborhoods. We had similar findings from these categories in our <br />last study, and the projections from those homes for this year were extremely accurate. <br /> <br />(2) The student population has increased in all price ranges of A TT dwellings, but the K-5 <br />percentage dropped significantly in the last year in the category representing the majority of <br />these students. That drop is not as clear of a trend as in SFD homes, and warrants close <br />observation in the future. Of particular note are the major overall ATT gains in the last year. The <br />"Modest Apartments, Townhouses & Condos" added 58 students while the more expensive <br />versions of those same dwelling types added 22. There are now more students In these <br />existing units than at any time in the last five years. These residences, however, often have <br />more year-to-year population fluctuations than SFD homes. Both of these price groupings had <br />different adjustments in recent years (see boxes in the table), including losses of 33 last year in <br />the modest group and by 23 the year before in the more expensive units. We therefore do not <br />consider the gains in 2005 to be an ongoing trend. These units provide less than one-sixth of <br />the students that are coming from existing dwellings and under one-seventh of the district total, <br />so any trend shifts are far less consequential than those in the SFD homes. <br /> <br />In aggregate, it is evident that the total enrollment would be declining next year and thereafter if not for <br />new housing. <br /> <br />Underlvina Factors: Students Proiected from Future New Houslna <br /> <br />New housing contributes to enrollment through a combination of the number of units, by category, <br />and the student generation rates (SGRs) generated per unit within each of those classifications. <br />These two aspects are discussed in the following subsections. <br /> <br />Averaae Student Generation Rates from Recentlv Built Residences <br /> <br />Student generation rates (SGRs) are the average rates at which dwelling units "yield" students, in this <br />case for enrollment in the Pleasanton Unified School District. SGRs are calculated by identifying the <br />number of students by grade in a suitable sample of residential units. The rates determined from <br />recently built housing are often considered the best estimation of what similar future homes will <br />generate, at least in the first few years of occupation. Several SGR types are often warranted. <br /> <br />We have identified four statistically meaningful SGRs from the recently built residences in the district: <br />(1) small-lot SFD, (2) medium- and large-lot SFD, (3) duets and (4) all other attached housing units." <br /> <br />12 The City of Pleasanton defines small lots as under 5,000 square feet, medium lots as 5,000-15,000 square <br />feet, and large iots as over 15,000 square feet. Our analyses of the populations in the various developments <br />has determined, however, that new homes on parcels in the roughly 5,000-6,000 square foot range had SGRs <br />closer to the small-lot category than the medium-Iof category. We therefore have included those homes in the <br />small-Iof classification for projection and SGR purposes. We also determined that the difference in the SGRs <br />between medium- and large-lot detached homes was insufficient to warrant separate identification. <br /> <br />,0a[E> 1:: <br /> <br />Enrollmen, urolectlOn C'onsultanrs <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.